Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20591 - 20600 of 70090 for hi.
Search results 20591 - 20600 of 70090 for hi.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for sentence modification. He 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502247 - 2022-03-31
denying his motion for sentence modification. He 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502247 - 2022-03-31
Sentry Insurance v. Jay Schrank
. Because there is no causal connection between Castona’s “use” of his motor vehicle and Schrank’s injuries
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19683 - 2005-12-11
. Because there is no causal connection between Castona’s “use” of his motor vehicle and Schrank’s injuries
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19683 - 2005-12-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sides made their sentencing arguments and Lefler exercised his right of allocution, the court followed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=685291 - 2023-07-28
sides made their sentencing arguments and Lefler exercised his right of allocution, the court followed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=685291 - 2023-07-28
[PDF]
State v. Romel D.
. contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because the No. 99-1919 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15775 - 2017-09-21
. contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because the No. 99-1919 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15775 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Gary L. Everts
denying in part and granting in part his motion for postconviction relief. The trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18233 - 2017-09-21
denying in part and granting in part his motion for postconviction relief. The trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18233 - 2017-09-21
Shannon Elizabeth Singer v. James Joseph Singer
, and maintenance. For the reasons discussed below, we reject his arguments and affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3070 - 2005-03-31
, and maintenance. For the reasons discussed below, we reject his arguments and affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3070 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey Lilly
armed and conspiracy to commit perjury before a court. He also appeals from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9492 - 2005-03-31
armed and conspiracy to commit perjury before a court. He also appeals from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9492 - 2005-03-31
State v. Darrell C. Solfest
of conviction and a trial court order denying his motion to vacate his guilty plea. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12201 - 2005-03-31
of conviction and a trial court order denying his motion to vacate his guilty plea. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12201 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his postconviction motion. He argues that: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70536 - 2011-09-06
an order denying his postconviction motion. He argues that: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70536 - 2011-09-06
State v. Sean M. Daley
safety and misdemeanor disorderly conduct, as well as an order denying his motion for plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20346 - 2006-01-09
safety and misdemeanor disorderly conduct, as well as an order denying his motion for plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20346 - 2006-01-09