Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2061 - 2070 of 92766 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja 1 Set Guguak Lima Puluh Kota.

Patricia H. Roth v. LaFarge School District Board of Canvassers
of voting electors recorded under subd. 1., reduced by the number of defective envelopes set aside under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3514 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI App 59
, Counts 1, 3, and 4. ¶15 For the reasons that follow, we agree with the State. After setting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=280581 - 2020-10-13

[PDF] Kenosha County DHS v. Katrina R.
. No. 2005AP1581 2 ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J. 1 Katrina R. appeals from an order terminating her parental rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20986 - 2017-09-21

Kenosha County DHS v. Katrina R.
: Mary Kay Wagner, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J.[1] Katrina R. appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20986 - 2006-01-16

[PDF] NOTICE
of the parties.” State v. Franklin, 148 Wis. 2d 1, 8, 434 N.W.2d 609 (1989) (citation omitted). Whether a set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61697 - 2014-09-15

WI 40 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Notice This order is subject to further editing and...
On May 1, 2008, the Board of Bar Examiners (BBE) filed a petition requesting this court create a supreme
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65572 - 2011-06-07

State v. Duane Joseph Lieske
he entered an Alford plea to one count of first-degree sexual assault, contrary to § 940.225(1)(d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9462 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was set). WISCONSIN STAT. § 973.155(1)(a) provides that an “offender shall be given credit toward
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676540 - 2023-07-06

State v. Robert J. Barnes
. The presentence report set forth Henger’s initial conclusion that Barnes’ risk of re-offending was high. Based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13395 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
an entire year in 2005 from being self-employed.”[1] ¶5 The court then set maintenance in the amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36430 - 2009-05-06