Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2061 - 2070 of 46600 for adult name change.

[PDF] Kathy Schulz v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
an adult family home, defined in WIS. STAT. § 50.01(1)(b) as a place where three or four adults unrelated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5872 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Third Branch, srping 2010
the biggest change was to the 16-member Court of Appeals, which will welcome three new judges to its ranks
/news/thirdbranch/docs/spring10.pdf - 2010-06-03

Tatiahanah Marie Miller v. Mauston School District
of that statute. We also conclude that even if the complaints were amended to name an officer, employee or agent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12689 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Tatiahanah Marie Miller v. Mauston School District
also conclude that even if the complaints were amended to name an officer, employee or agent of CESA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12689 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
murder is not an offense for which there is original jurisdiction in adult court. The State opposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87593 - 2014-09-15

State v. Yathzee D. Inman
he was waived into adult court. In this appeal from the judgment of conviction and an order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10404 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
on the basis that felony murder is not an offense for which there is original jurisdiction in adult court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87593 - 2012-10-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, the party seeking modification must demonstrate that there has been a substantial change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94513 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
a substantial change in circumstances warranting the proposed modification.” Rohde-Giovanni v. Baumgart, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94513 - 2013-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
a substantial change in circumstances warranting the proposed modification.” Rohde-Giovanni v. Baumgart, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94924 - 2013-03-31