Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2061 - 2070 of 62304 for child support.
Search results 2061 - 2070 of 62304 for child support.
State v. Randall W. Edwards
that the child's allegations "were made in a vacuum and without any corroborating support" does not render her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11393 - 2005-03-31
that the child's allegations "were made in a vacuum and without any corroborating support" does not render her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11393 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to prove that he had sexual intercourse with the child. This finding is supported by the record. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173673 - 2017-09-21
to prove that he had sexual intercourse with the child. This finding is supported by the record. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173673 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Post-Judgment Motion/Order to Show Cause Packet
Custody, Physical Placement, Child Support, Maintenance, Arrears Payment (FA-4171VA/B) Notice
/formdisplay/FA-5008V_instructions.pdf?formNumber=FA-5008V&formType=Instructions&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-03-03
Custody, Physical Placement, Child Support, Maintenance, Arrears Payment (FA-4171VA/B) Notice
/formdisplay/FA-5008V_instructions.pdf?formNumber=FA-5008V&formType=Instructions&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-03-03
[PDF]
Peggy Sue Podolak v. John Peter Podolak
, with John having primary physical placement. Peggy was ordered to pay $236 in child support per month
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6283 - 2017-09-19
, with John having primary physical placement. Peggy was ordered to pay $236 in child support per month
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6283 - 2017-09-19
Peggy Sue Podolak v. John Peter Podolak
was ordered to pay $236 in child support per month, based on an imputed wage of $8 an hour, and John
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6283 - 2005-03-31
was ordered to pay $236 in child support per month, based on an imputed wage of $8 an hour, and John
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6283 - 2005-03-31
Margaret E. Koeller v. Ralph C. Koeller
to the child's best interest as shown by substantial evidence supporting a change in custody ...." Schwantes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8211 - 2005-03-31
to the child's best interest as shown by substantial evidence supporting a change in custody ...." Schwantes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8211 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI APP 161
, under Wis. Stat. § 940.02(2)(a), and contributing to the delinquency of a child with death
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41725 - 2009-11-23
, under Wis. Stat. § 940.02(2)(a), and contributing to the delinquency of a child with death
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41725 - 2009-11-23
CA Blank Order
failed to provide any support for his daughter. The court found that the child did not have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141507 - 2015-05-06
failed to provide any support for his daughter. The court found that the child did not have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141507 - 2015-05-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that there were “no good reasonable items in the best interest of the child” that could support a name change
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375649 - 2021-06-10
that there were “no good reasonable items in the best interest of the child” that could support a name change
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375649 - 2021-06-10
COURT OF APPEALS
to be a child in need of protection or services (CHIPS) based on Tara’s admission to neglect—that she should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91508 - 2013-01-14
to be a child in need of protection or services (CHIPS) based on Tara’s admission to neglect—that she should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91508 - 2013-01-14