Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2061 - 2070 of 29821 for des.
Search results 2061 - 2070 of 29821 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
questions of law that this court reviews de novo.” Id. ¶5 The dispositive issue on appeal is which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171900 - 2017-09-21
questions of law that this court reviews de novo.” Id. ¶5 The dispositive issue on appeal is which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171900 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
) (discussing the three levels of deference: “great weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41530 - 2009-09-28
) (discussing the three levels of deference: “great weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41530 - 2009-09-28
COURT OF APPEALS
an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64172 - 2011-05-17
an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64172 - 2011-05-17
John Bettendorf v. St. Croix County Board of Adjustment
court and examine the record de novo. State v. Winnebago County, 196 Wis.2d 836, 842, 540 N.W.2d 6, 8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14376 - 2005-03-31
court and examine the record de novo. State v. Winnebago County, 196 Wis.2d 836, 842, 540 N.W.2d 6, 8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14376 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and thus forfeited any error. See id., 124 Wis. 2d at 54, 368 N.W.2d at 51. We decide de novo the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118898 - 2014-09-15
, and thus forfeited any error. See id., 124 Wis. 2d at 54, 368 N.W.2d at 51. We decide de novo the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118898 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
The small claims court commissioner granted the motion to dismiss. Lacy requested a trial de novo before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32469 - 2014-09-15
The small claims court commissioner granted the motion to dismiss. Lacy requested a trial de novo before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32469 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 23
review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Munger v. Seehafer, 2016 WI App 89, ¶46
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=775494 - 2024-05-08
review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Munger v. Seehafer, 2016 WI App 89, ¶46
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=775494 - 2024-05-08
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same methodology as the circuit court. M&I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31208 - 2007-12-18
court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same methodology as the circuit court. M&I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31208 - 2007-12-18
State v. Jose R.
legal conclusions are reviewed de novo. Id., ¶16. Here, Jose R. does not contend that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19172 - 2005-08-01
legal conclusions are reviewed de novo. Id., ¶16. Here, Jose R. does not contend that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19172 - 2005-08-01
County of Waukesha v. Laura J. M.
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SNYDER, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19177 - 2005-08-02
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SNYDER, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19177 - 2005-08-02