Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2061 - 2070 of 6143 for li.
Search results 2061 - 2070 of 6143 for li.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that a circuit court assigns to the sentencing factors lies within the circuit court’s wide discretion. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102636 - 2017-09-21
that a circuit court assigns to the sentencing factors lies within the circuit court’s wide discretion. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102636 - 2017-09-21
State v. John S. Bergmann
) and the order denying his motion for reconsideration (99-0156-CR).[1] ANALYSIS ¶5 Sentencing lies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14344 - 2005-03-31
) and the order denying his motion for reconsideration (99-0156-CR).[1] ANALYSIS ¶5 Sentencing lies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14344 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
prosecution claim. “[M]alicious prosecution lies only when a plaintiff’s interests are invaded
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=832606 - 2024-07-30
prosecution claim. “[M]alicious prosecution lies only when a plaintiff’s interests are invaded
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=832606 - 2024-07-30
State v. James D. Jacobson
indicated he had lied at trial because he was being threatened by those actually responsible for shooting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8556 - 2005-03-31
indicated he had lied at trial because he was being threatened by those actually responsible for shooting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8556 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
lies within the discretion of the circuit court. Helgeland, 307 Wis. 2d 1, ¶120. An appellate court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82616 - 2012-05-16
lies within the discretion of the circuit court. Helgeland, 307 Wis. 2d 1, ¶120. An appellate court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82616 - 2012-05-16
COURT OF APPEALS
“lied at the [suppression] hearing and at trial”; and (3) object to the State’s “unconstitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98457 - 2013-06-24
“lied at the [suppression] hearing and at trial”; and (3) object to the State’s “unconstitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98457 - 2013-06-24
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneously exercised its discretion when it sentenced him. Sentencing lies within the sound discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30619 - 2007-10-16
erroneously exercised its discretion when it sentenced him. Sentencing lies within the sound discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30619 - 2007-10-16
COURT OF APPEALS
Strupp for going to trial. Sentencing lies within the sound discretion of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69082 - 2011-08-03
Strupp for going to trial. Sentencing lies within the sound discretion of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69082 - 2011-08-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, “a reasonable juror could conclud[e] that Kennedy not only witnessed the previous homicide but lied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235529 - 2019-02-26
, “a reasonable juror could conclud[e] that Kennedy not only witnessed the previous homicide but lied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235529 - 2019-02-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
of whether to admit or exclude evidence generally lies Nos. 2009AP2954 2009AP2955 2009AP2956 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60150 - 2014-09-15
of whether to admit or exclude evidence generally lies Nos. 2009AP2954 2009AP2955 2009AP2956 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60150 - 2014-09-15