Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20611 - 20620 of 82758 for case codes/1000.
Search results 20611 - 20620 of 82758 for case codes/1000.
James R. Koby v. La Crosse County Circuit Court
not apply in criminal cases. We do not address that question, however, because we conclude that Koby had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4966 - 2005-03-31
not apply in criminal cases. We do not address that question, however, because we conclude that Koby had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4966 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
operated his vehicle normally. The court denied Fuller’s motion, stating: [I]t is a close case but I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30593 - 2014-09-15
operated his vehicle normally. The court denied Fuller’s motion, stating: [I]t is a close case but I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30593 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
James R. Koby v. La Crosse County Circuit Court
not apply in criminal cases. We do not address that question, however, because we conclude that Koby had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4966 - 2017-09-19
not apply in criminal cases. We do not address that question, however, because we conclude that Koby had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4966 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
motion, stating: [I]t is a close case but I do believe you factor in the two forty-five a.m. time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30593 - 2007-10-15
motion, stating: [I]t is a close case but I do believe you factor in the two forty-five a.m. time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30593 - 2007-10-15
CA Blank Order
of operating while intoxicated in a separate case, No. 2010CT727. In exchange, the State moved to dismiss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104491 - 2013-11-13
of operating while intoxicated in a separate case, No. 2010CT727. In exchange, the State moved to dismiss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104491 - 2013-11-13
[PDF]
State v. Patrick C. Webster
and affirm. In Dane County case no. 95-CF-349, the State charged Webster, as a repeater, with a theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13368 - 2017-09-21
and affirm. In Dane County case no. 95-CF-349, the State charged Webster, as a repeater, with a theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13368 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Patrick C. Webster
and affirm. In Dane County case no. 95-CF-349, the State charged Webster, as a repeater, with a theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13367 - 2017-09-21
and affirm. In Dane County case no. 95-CF-349, the State charged Webster, as a repeater, with a theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13367 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We reject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141632 - 2015-05-10
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We reject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141632 - 2015-05-10
[PDF]
State v. Patrick C. Webster
and affirm. In Dane County case no. 95-CF-349, the State charged Webster, as a repeater, with a theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13366 - 2017-09-21
and affirm. In Dane County case no. 95-CF-349, the State charged Webster, as a repeater, with a theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13366 - 2017-09-21
Melissa Garcia v. Duaine C. Stillman
to place the “witnesses” under oath. The procedural history of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10686 - 2005-03-31
to place the “witnesses” under oath. The procedural history of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10686 - 2005-03-31