Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20611 - 20620 of 68271 for law.
Search results 20611 - 20620 of 68271 for law.
[PDF]
NOTICE
” law, alleges that the court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion by imposing an unduly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29419 - 2014-09-15
” law, alleges that the court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion by imposing an unduly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29419 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of discretion results when it is based on an error of law or when the circuit court does not consider the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104801 - 2013-11-25
of discretion results when it is based on an error of law or when the circuit court does not consider the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104801 - 2013-11-25
State v. Timothy A. Hellman
based on the facts of record and the appropriate law. State v. Avery, 215 Wis. 2d 45, 56, 571 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2725 - 2005-03-31
based on the facts of record and the appropriate law. State v. Avery, 215 Wis. 2d 45, 56, 571 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2725 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Amy S. Plummer v. Tina M. Roberts
was insufficient, as a matter No. 02-0043-FT 2 of law, to overcome the presumption that Tina
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4805 - 2017-09-20
was insufficient, as a matter No. 02-0043-FT 2 of law, to overcome the presumption that Tina
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4805 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
Court Center 10201 W. Watertown Plank Rd. Milwaukee, WI 53226 Timothy T. Kay Kay & Kay Law Firm 675 N
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147090 - 2015-08-20
Court Center 10201 W. Watertown Plank Rd. Milwaukee, WI 53226 Timothy T. Kay Kay & Kay Law Firm 675 N
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147090 - 2015-08-20
Certification
the “reasonable use” rule of State v. Deetz, 66 Wis. 2d 1, 224 N.W.2d 407 (1974), and its progeny remains the law
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34109 - 2008-09-24
the “reasonable use” rule of State v. Deetz, 66 Wis. 2d 1, 224 N.W.2d 407 (1974), and its progeny remains the law
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34109 - 2008-09-24
[PDF]
State v. Scot A. Czarnecki
the trial court's fact-finding function nor a determination of constitutional law. Rather, it calls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10227 - 2017-09-20
the trial court's fact-finding function nor a determination of constitutional law. Rather, it calls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10227 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
N.W.2d 69 (1975)). Whether a fact or set of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138484 - 2017-09-21
N.W.2d 69 (1975)). Whether a fact or set of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138484 - 2017-09-21
State v. Calvin Shields
requirement of reasonableness under the Fourth Amendment, however, presents a question of law subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15493 - 2005-03-31
requirement of reasonableness under the Fourth Amendment, however, presents a question of law subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15493 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
contrary to law by not holding the assessor to the proper burden of proof to support the assessment. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55425 - 2014-09-15
contrary to law by not holding the assessor to the proper burden of proof to support the assessment. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55425 - 2014-09-15