Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20621 - 20630 of 68527 for did.
Search results 20621 - 20630 of 68527 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
process of law and effective representation because his reconfinement counsel did not have access
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40989 - 2009-09-21
process of law and effective representation because his reconfinement counsel did not have access
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40989 - 2009-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court erred when it concluded that he did not request an alternative test. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31609 - 2009-09-13
that the circuit court erred when it concluded that he did not request an alternative test. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31609 - 2009-09-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as a motion for summary judgment. The court determined that the facts of record established that BANA did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110744 - 2017-09-21
as a motion for summary judgment. The court determined that the facts of record established that BANA did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110744 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
pleas. The psychiatrist filed a report opining that Brown did not have a major mental illness
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488172 - 2022-03-01
pleas. The psychiatrist filed a report opining that Brown did not have a major mental illness
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488172 - 2022-03-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Officer Bartels then had Blum perform field sobriety tests. Blum did not pass the tests, and Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36830 - 2014-09-15
. Officer Bartels then had Blum perform field sobriety tests. Blum did not pass the tests, and Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36830 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
contended was the basis for the traffic stop in this case. He also argued the criminal complaint did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173507 - 2017-09-21
contended was the basis for the traffic stop in this case. He also argued the criminal complaint did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173507 - 2017-09-21
Graham L. Smith v. Pamela Mae Smith
was not required to “divest and transfer the title” of the business. Nor did the statute prohibit the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18313 - 2005-05-25
was not required to “divest and transfer the title” of the business. Nor did the statute prohibit the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18313 - 2005-05-25
[PDF]
State v. Dale W. Repinski
counsel did discuss the consequences of consolidation with Repinski and made a reasonable strategic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10179 - 2017-09-19
counsel did discuss the consequences of consolidation with Repinski and made a reasonable strategic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10179 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Kyle J. Nelson
of an intoxicant (OWI). He argues the police officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18180 - 2017-09-21
of an intoxicant (OWI). He argues the police officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18180 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
: Okay. Now, are you thinking clearly? A: Yes, ma’am. Q: Did you read the criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110227 - 2014-04-15
: Okay. Now, are you thinking clearly? A: Yes, ma’am. Q: Did you read the criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110227 - 2014-04-15