Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20631 - 20640 of 46677 for adult name change.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. In January 2018, the State filed an amended information changing the date of the alleged burglary and theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263225 - 2020-06-04

[PDF] Theresa L. C. v. Jeremy C. P.
erroneously exercised its discretion by not ordering a new trial or changing the verdict answer, (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7084 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Sawyer County Board of Appeals
amendment change.” One board member stated, I’m going to make a motion that we grant the variance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5380 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
dissenter but later changed his mind.” T.W. argued that there was a reasonable probability that the GAL’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217987 - 2018-08-21

COURT OF APPEALS
not have changed its mind at all as to the sentence imposed. The court explained that it first determines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108402 - 2014-02-25

[PDF] NOTICE
discussed. The Lasee letter refers to “policy change.” However, a letter from a legislator
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59647 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Gerald Witkowski v. Barry Weber
complaint’s claim that Chief Weber was estopped from changing the promotion criteria and policy. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11476 - 2017-09-19

OPINION 06-1R
after the White decision, but the other sections of the judicial rules were not changed as a result
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26941 - 2006-10-24

[PDF] Charles A. Poindexter II v. Pamela J. Kagan
that Poindexter’s proven record of sexual abuse constituted a “huge change of circumstances,” noting that “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15079 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 5, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
to State v. Franklin, 148 Wis. 2d 1, 14, 434 N.W.2d 609 (1989) (change in parole policy not relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27313 - 2006-12-04