Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20631 - 20640 of 29740 for des.
Search results 20631 - 20640 of 29740 for des.
James V. Holschbach v. Washington Park Manor
judgment. We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same well-known methodology the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7518 - 2005-03-31
judgment. We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same well-known methodology the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7518 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on certiorari review, our role is not “to weigh the evidence; certiorari is not a de novo review.” Van Ermen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053789 - 2025-12-23
on certiorari review, our role is not “to weigh the evidence; certiorari is not a de novo review.” Van Ermen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053789 - 2025-12-23
Village of Cross Plains v. Kristin J. Haanstad
interpretation is a question of law reviewed de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21382 - 2006-02-13
interpretation is a question of law reviewed de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21382 - 2006-02-13
[PDF]
State v. Johnson W. Greybuffalo
offense instruction is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. Here, the parties agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9567 - 2017-09-19
offense instruction is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. Here, the parties agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9567 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. James L. Blackburn
the interpretation of § 976.05, STATS., a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Whittemore, 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12090 - 2017-09-21
the interpretation of § 976.05, STATS., a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Whittemore, 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12090 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court, is a question of law that we review de novo. See Oneida Cnty. DSS v. Therese S., 2008 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193617 - 2017-09-21
court, is a question of law that we review de novo. See Oneida Cnty. DSS v. Therese S., 2008 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193617 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Discussion ¶15 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107502 - 2017-09-21
. Discussion ¶15 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107502 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Town of Lyndon v. Gilbert D. Jensen
of law subject to de novo review. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin v. Dane County Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19336 - 2017-09-21
of law subject to de novo review. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin v. Dane County Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19336 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Monroe County Department of Human Services v. Lee J. B.
be terminated, is a question of law which we decide de novo. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2657 - 2017-09-19
be terminated, is a question of law which we decide de novo. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2657 - 2017-09-19
State v. Albert Jackowski
review of the magistrate’s determination is not de novo, rather, we pay “great deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3169 - 2005-03-31
review of the magistrate’s determination is not de novo, rather, we pay “great deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3169 - 2005-03-31