Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20661 - 20670 of 68502 for did.
Search results 20661 - 20670 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with prejudice. Dodson now appeals. No. 2014AP574 3 It is undisputed that the circuit court did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156095 - 2017-09-21
with prejudice. Dodson now appeals. No. 2014AP574 3 It is undisputed that the circuit court did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156095 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that counsel made errors so serious that (1) counsel did not function as the “counsel” the Sixth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93595 - 2014-09-15
that counsel made errors so serious that (1) counsel did not function as the “counsel” the Sixth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93595 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Officer Bartels then had Blum perform field sobriety tests. Blum did not pass the tests, and Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36830 - 2014-09-15
. Officer Bartels then had Blum perform field sobriety tests. Blum did not pass the tests, and Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36830 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Fernando R. Salinas
misinterpreted Salinas’s juvenile record. We conclude that the court did not do so, and therefore, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20482 - 2017-09-21
misinterpreted Salinas’s juvenile record. We conclude that the court did not do so, and therefore, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20482 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
“grant[ing] 17 days of pretrial incarceration credit.” The judgment did not specify how the credit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98998 - 2014-09-15
“grant[ing] 17 days of pretrial incarceration credit.” The judgment did not specify how the credit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98998 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, as did Dr. Christopher Ovide. Our review of their testimony satisfies us that the court commissioner
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101725 - 2017-09-21
, as did Dr. Christopher Ovide. Our review of their testimony satisfies us that the court commissioner
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101725 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Scott L. Wundrow
an odor of intoxicants about Wundrow. She stated she did not ask Wundrow any questions at that time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6660 - 2017-09-20
an odor of intoxicants about Wundrow. She stated she did not ask Wundrow any questions at that time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6660 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Dick's Fireside, Inc. v. Willis Corroon Corporation of Wisconsin, Inc.
, it did not have a duty to reduce Klopcic Companies' costs by obtaining lower priced insurance. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7935 - 2017-09-19
, it did not have a duty to reduce Klopcic Companies' costs by obtaining lower priced insurance. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7935 - 2017-09-19
State v. Clayton T. Veldt
of the second offense, that he had a prior offense and that the State did not and could not do so. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5357 - 2005-03-31
of the second offense, that he had a prior offense and that the State did not and could not do so. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5357 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to rectify the motion’s “numerous defects” within thirty days. When she did not do so, the court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72650 - 2011-10-25
to rectify the motion’s “numerous defects” within thirty days. When she did not do so, the court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72650 - 2011-10-25