Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20661 - 20670 of 59339 for quit claim deed.

State v. Leonard R. Avery
discovered evidence. Avery claims he should be granted a new trial because: (1) the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21746 - 2006-03-13

[PDF] Debra M. Wikel v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
of Transportation. She argues that the court erred in concluding that her petition failed to state a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3322 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
there is a meritorious defense to the claim; and whether there are intervening circumstances making it inequitable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89091 - 2012-11-07

State v. Frank L. Little
indicated the microwave oven was thrown to the floor but, at trial, Wing claimed to not remember
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7270 - 2005-03-31

Stephen D. Artus v. Town of Three Lakes
personal injury claim against the Town of Three Lakes, Lloyd Harris, and their insurers. Artus argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2996 - 2005-03-31

Lennart E. Ivarson v. William V. Samatas
that the claim could not be disposed of by summary judgment because issues of fact exist as to Ivarson’s conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10674 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. It concludes that there would be no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242538 - 2019-06-19

[PDF] State v. Perk E. Thomas
in question, before Thomas and his wife went to bed, Thomas claimed that his wife initially refused his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14969 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was false. Salinas claimed he told the attorney that he had sex with the victim a total of four times
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143393 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
of Waukesha Ironworks (Ironworks). Acuity claimed that it was entitled to subrogation from Partners
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27201 - 2014-09-15