Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20661 - 20670 of 22932 for warrants/1000.
Search results 20661 - 20670 of 22932 for warrants/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
alleged ineffectiveness prejudiced him and warrants a new trial. We disagree. Lumping together failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65045 - 2011-05-31
alleged ineffectiveness prejudiced him and warrants a new trial. We disagree. Lumping together failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65045 - 2011-05-31
2006 WI APP 250
to an interpreter. Next, he argues that plea withdrawal is warranted on the unmitigated kidnapping conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27071 - 2006-12-19
to an interpreter. Next, he argues that plea withdrawal is warranted on the unmitigated kidnapping conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27071 - 2006-12-19
COURT OF APPEALS
a recantation satisfies the newly-discovered evidence test. ¶22 To warrant a new trial, the recantations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122803 - 2014-09-29
a recantation satisfies the newly-discovered evidence test. ¶22 To warrant a new trial, the recantations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122803 - 2014-09-29
[PDF]
State v. Mark T. Smith
these findings or new circumstances that warranted another competency evaluation or hearing. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6931 - 2017-09-20
these findings or new circumstances that warranted another competency evaluation or hearing. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6931 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
and citations omitted). ¶14 Relief pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 806.07(1)(h) “is warranted only when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36586 - 2014-09-15
and citations omitted). ¶14 Relief pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 806.07(1)(h) “is warranted only when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36586 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
are unconvinced that a new trial is warranted in this case. By the Court.—Judgment and order affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33862 - 2014-09-15
are unconvinced that a new trial is warranted in this case. By the Court.—Judgment and order affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33862 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
must determine whether, in its discretion, equitable relief is warranted). ¶31 Proof of an unjust
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163995 - 2017-09-21
must determine whether, in its discretion, equitable relief is warranted). ¶31 Proof of an unjust
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163995 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Holly Lynn Weiss v. City of Milwaukee
was warranted because Weiss's exclusive remedy was under worker's compensation. In doing so, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7762 - 2017-09-19
was warranted because Weiss's exclusive remedy was under worker's compensation. In doing so, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7762 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
that the Town’s argument is insufficiently developed and warrants no further consideration. See State v. Pettit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34785 - 2008-12-03
that the Town’s argument is insufficiently developed and warrants no further consideration. See State v. Pettit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34785 - 2008-12-03
Brown County v. Wade H.
that either the efficient administration of justice warrants it or that due process considerations outweigh
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15818 - 2005-03-31
that either the efficient administration of justice warrants it or that due process considerations outweigh
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15818 - 2005-03-31