Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20671 - 20680 of 98582 for civil court case status online.
Search results 20671 - 20680 of 98582 for civil court case status online.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” in this case, which the court agreed to do. The court stated that it reviewed the official circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677696 - 2023-07-11
” in this case, which the court agreed to do. The court stated that it reviewed the official circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677696 - 2023-07-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 19, 2020 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261141 - 2020-05-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 19, 2020 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261141 - 2020-05-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court with evidence regarding sentencings in other cases that he asserts are similar to this one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=615340 - 2023-01-26
court with evidence regarding sentencings in other cases that he asserts are similar to this one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=615340 - 2023-01-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that “there was … not a prima facie case of purposeful discrimination.” The court explained its basis for that finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147149 - 2017-09-21
that “there was … not a prima facie case of purposeful discrimination.” The court explained its basis for that finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147149 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
testified in this case, as quoted by the circuit court in its decision, “[T]he purpose [of the 1981 change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136661 - 2017-09-21
testified in this case, as quoted by the circuit court in its decision, “[T]he purpose [of the 1981 change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136661 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) the court improperly admitted lay opinion testimony identifying Hirsi as the shooter in the St. Paul case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256689 - 2020-03-17
) the court improperly admitted lay opinion testimony identifying Hirsi as the shooter in the St. Paul case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256689 - 2020-03-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
statements to others that he would “beat this case.” The circuit court ruled that those statements were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251458 - 2019-12-17
statements to others that he would “beat this case.” The circuit court ruled that those statements were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251458 - 2019-12-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assault case. The court raised Christel’s eligibility for the Substance Abuse Program (SAP) due to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460631 - 2021-12-09
assault case. The court raised Christel’s eligibility for the Substance Abuse Program (SAP) due to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460631 - 2021-12-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2023. Nico appealed, and this court concluded that he had made a prima facie case for plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=844616 - 2024-09-04
2023. Nico appealed, and this court concluded that he had made a prima facie case for plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=844616 - 2024-09-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The circuit court dismissed the prior case commenced by LTD against Meier for defective service, stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=382494 - 2021-06-29
. The circuit court dismissed the prior case commenced by LTD against Meier for defective service, stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=382494 - 2021-06-29