Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20671 - 20680 of 30242 for de.

Jacquie Hur v. Laverne Holler
will therefore review the type of sanctions available under § 804.12, Stats., de novo. However, determinations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10168 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92615 - 2013-02-12

COURT OF APPEALS
to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31019 - 2007-11-26

COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433. We review the sufficiency of a postconviction motion de novo, based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36413 - 2009-05-06

State v. Lillian L. Nash
we review de novo. Id. However, if the defendant fails to allege sufficient facts in his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12212 - 2005-03-31

Glenn F. Plautz By Charlotte Pagel v. Time Insurance Company
court, our review of a trial court's grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10001 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
conducting de novo review, however, appellate courts 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925477 - 2025-03-12

Bruce L. Ottinger v. Jose Pinel
we review de novo. See id. at 497, 536 N.W.2d at 182. As the material facts are conceded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11758 - 2005-03-31

Leonard Chmill v. Lauderdale Lakes Lake Management District
of law we review de novo. Reyes v. Greatway Ins. Co., 227 Wis. 2d 357, 364-65, 597 N.W.2d 687 (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4963 - 2005-03-31

Community National Bank v. Medical Benefit Administrators, LLC
with a question of law, which we review de novo. Vocational, Technical & Adult Educ., Dist. 13 v. DILHR, 76 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16220 - 2005-03-31