Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20671 - 20680 of 68502 for did.
Search results 20671 - 20680 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Bruce A. Rumage
referred to vaginal intercourse. When it referred to the verdict form for Count 3, the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12093 - 2017-09-21
referred to vaginal intercourse. When it referred to the verdict form for Count 3, the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12093 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to Tovar-Medina as did testing from the inner swath of K.B.’s underwear. On cross-examination, trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231742 - 2019-01-09
to Tovar-Medina as did testing from the inner swath of K.B.’s underwear. On cross-examination, trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231742 - 2019-01-09
[PDF]
State v. James W. Woller
sentence, Woller contends that the court did not explain how the ultimate sentence reflected the minimum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20253 - 2017-09-21
sentence, Woller contends that the court did not explain how the ultimate sentence reflected the minimum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20253 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 346.04(2t), Owens asserts that he did not violate § 346.04(2t) because he “did not ‘knowingly resist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191677 - 2017-09-21
. § 346.04(2t), Owens asserts that he did not violate § 346.04(2t) because he “did not ‘knowingly resist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191677 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Clark Anderson v. State
any injury to his mouth, and did not have any pain or clicking problems with his jaw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8905 - 2017-09-19
any injury to his mouth, and did not have any pain or clicking problems with his jaw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8905 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Clayton T. Veldt
a prior offense and that the State did not and could not do so. Therefore, he reasons his second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5357 - 2017-09-19
a prior offense and that the State did not and could not do so. Therefore, he reasons his second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5357 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, the defendant must show that counsel made errors so serious that (1) counsel did not function as the “counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93595 - 2013-03-05
, the defendant must show that counsel made errors so serious that (1) counsel did not function as the “counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93595 - 2013-03-05
Jerold I. Giesie v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin
General Casualty to pay Jerold the $10,000 plus interest. General Casualty did not immediately pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19758 - 2005-09-26
General Casualty to pay Jerold the $10,000 plus interest. General Casualty did not immediately pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19758 - 2005-09-26
State v. James McCready
comes before this court arguing that the circuit court did not have subject matter jurisdiction to grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15745 - 2005-03-31
comes before this court arguing that the circuit court did not have subject matter jurisdiction to grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15745 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher T. Seiler
.2d 666, 671 (1979). The victims' testimony did not rise to this level, and we accordingly reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9561 - 2005-03-31
.2d 666, 671 (1979). The victims' testimony did not rise to this level, and we accordingly reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9561 - 2005-03-31