Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20671 - 20680 of 34728 for in n.
Search results 20671 - 20680 of 34728 for in n.
COURT OF APPEALS
by probable cause. State v. Lange, 2009 WI 49, ¶19 & n.6, 317 Wis. 2d 383, 766 N.W.2d 551. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58132 - 2010-12-22
by probable cause. State v. Lange, 2009 WI 49, ¶19 & n.6, 317 Wis. 2d 383, 766 N.W.2d 551. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58132 - 2010-12-22
[PDF]
WI APP 19
at 716 n.8, resting its conclusion instead on previous interpretations of the phrase “adverse party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77020 - 2014-09-15
at 716 n.8, resting its conclusion instead on previous interpretations of the phrase “adverse party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77020 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Terry and Cathy Laube v. City of Owen
to condemn the Laubes’ property. See City of Racine v. Bassinger, 163 Wis.2d 1029, 1036 n.5, 473 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11456 - 2017-09-19
to condemn the Laubes’ property. See City of Racine v. Bassinger, 163 Wis.2d 1029, 1036 n.5, 473 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11456 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
At sentencing, trial counsel explicitly stated that the defense had “[n]o objections” to the restitution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220831 - 2018-10-04
At sentencing, trial counsel explicitly stated that the defense had “[n]o objections” to the restitution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220831 - 2018-10-04
Waukesha County v. Michael Serwin
, § 802.08, Stats. See Continental Casualty, 175 Wis.2d at 535 n.2, 499 N.W.2d at 285. Indeed, motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11534 - 2005-03-31
, § 802.08, Stats. See Continental Casualty, 175 Wis.2d at 535 n.2, 499 N.W.2d at 285. Indeed, motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11534 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Emmanuel L. Branch
-CR 6 [I]n reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, an appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15656 - 2017-09-21
-CR 6 [I]n reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, an appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15656 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to determine whether a violation took place. See Wurtz v. Fleischman, 97 Wis. 2d 100, 107 n.3, 293 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958215 - 2025-05-21
to determine whether a violation took place. See Wurtz v. Fleischman, 97 Wis. 2d 100, 107 n.3, 293 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958215 - 2025-05-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, 105-06 n.2, 585 N.W.2d 899 (Ct. App. 1998). Nevertheless, he complains that a sentence twice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29623 - 2007-07-09
, 105-06 n.2, 585 N.W.2d 899 (Ct. App. 1998). Nevertheless, he complains that a sentence twice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29623 - 2007-07-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
the blood was collected was not preserved, and “[i]n hindsight” saving the glass “would have been a better
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53135 - 2014-09-15
the blood was collected was not preserved, and “[i]n hindsight” saving the glass “would have been a better
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53135 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
not in court, defendant in custody. George N[.] Prietz appeared for the State of Wisconsin, for attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131343 - 2014-12-08
not in court, defendant in custody. George N[.] Prietz appeared for the State of Wisconsin, for attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131343 - 2014-12-08