Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20681 - 20690 of 25845 for bench warrant/1000.
Search results 20681 - 20690 of 25845 for bench warrant/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-half of the sum, but this is a de minimis discrepancy that does not warrant modification or reversal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256930 - 2020-04-14
-half of the sum, but this is a de minimis discrepancy that does not warrant modification or reversal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256930 - 2020-04-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court that the striking similarities between this case and Booth warrant the same outcome. Like Booth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227041 - 2018-11-13
court that the striking similarities between this case and Booth warrant the same outcome. Like Booth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227041 - 2018-11-13
[PDF]
State v. James A. Sybers
duties. ¶10 A manifest injustice warranting a plea withdrawal also occurs when a defendant does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5668 - 2017-09-19
duties. ¶10 A manifest injustice warranting a plea withdrawal also occurs when a defendant does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5668 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
it believed a maximum jail sentence—and thereby a deviation from the guidelines—was warranted, see supra
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173768 - 2017-09-21
it believed a maximum jail sentence—and thereby a deviation from the guidelines—was warranted, see supra
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173768 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Mark Koshney
the claimed error was prejudicial so that a mistrial was warranted. See State v. Hampton, 217 Wis. 2d 614
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2701 - 2017-09-19
the claimed error was prejudicial so that a mistrial was warranted. See State v. Hampton, 217 Wis. 2d 614
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2701 - 2017-09-19
Everett Carlson v. Oconto County Board of Canvassers
the two votes affected the outcome so as to warrant invalidation of the election. The trial court stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2765 - 2005-03-31
the two votes affected the outcome so as to warrant invalidation of the election. The trial court stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2765 - 2005-03-31
Amy M. Kordus v. Katherine A. Parks
. The trial court found insufficient evidence to warrant a finding of excusable neglect and denied Attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16154 - 2007-09-27
. The trial court found insufficient evidence to warrant a finding of excusable neglect and denied Attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16154 - 2007-09-27
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
and the postconviction hearing that he did not deem any of the inaccuracies sufficiently material to warrant the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26845 - 2006-10-18
and the postconviction hearing that he did not deem any of the inaccuracies sufficiently material to warrant the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26845 - 2006-10-18
COURT OF APPEALS
the issue raised by this inmate” and that Robles had not presented any information warranting reversal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90134 - 2012-12-05
the issue raised by this inmate” and that Robles had not presented any information warranting reversal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90134 - 2012-12-05
COURT OF APPEALS
(1997). Summary judgment is warranted when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74750 - 2011-12-06
(1997). Summary judgment is warranted when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74750 - 2011-12-06