Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20691 - 20700 of 30242 for de.
Search results 20691 - 20700 of 30242 for de.
Monroe County Department of Human Services v. Lee J. B.
we decide de novo. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862-63, 537 N.W.2d 47 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2657 - 2005-03-31
we decide de novo. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862-63, 537 N.W.2d 47 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2657 - 2005-03-31
Bruce L. Ottinger v. Jose Pinel
we review de novo. See id. at 497, 536 N.W.2d at 182. As the material facts are conceded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11758 - 2005-03-31
we review de novo. See id. at 497, 536 N.W.2d at 182. As the material facts are conceded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11758 - 2005-03-31
Leonard Chmill v. Lauderdale Lakes Lake Management District
of law we review de novo. Reyes v. Greatway Ins. Co., 227 Wis. 2d 357, 364-65, 597 N.W.2d 687 (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4963 - 2005-03-31
of law we review de novo. Reyes v. Greatway Ins. Co., 227 Wis. 2d 357, 364-65, 597 N.W.2d 687 (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4963 - 2005-03-31
Community National Bank v. Medical Benefit Administrators, LLC
with a question of law, which we review de novo. Vocational, Technical & Adult Educ., Dist. 13 v. DILHR, 76 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16220 - 2005-03-31
with a question of law, which we review de novo. Vocational, Technical & Adult Educ., Dist. 13 v. DILHR, 76 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16220 - 2005-03-31
Lori Ruff and Kevin G. Ruff v. Evelyn Graziano
. The interpretation of an insurance contract presents a question of law which we review de novo. See Oaks v. American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12606 - 2005-03-31
. The interpretation of an insurance contract presents a question of law which we review de novo. See Oaks v. American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12606 - 2005-03-31
State v. James B.
., 179 Wis. 2d at 150, 507 N.W.2d at 107. We review de novo, however, whether the trial court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6191 - 2005-03-31
., 179 Wis. 2d at 150, 507 N.W.2d at 107. We review de novo, however, whether the trial court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6191 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
performance was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144308 - 2015-07-13
performance was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144308 - 2015-07-13
State v. Charles E. Jones
and seizures was violated, however, is a question of constitutional fact, which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18740 - 2005-06-27
and seizures was violated, however, is a question of constitutional fact, which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18740 - 2005-06-27
COURT OF APPEALS
). Application of a statute to the facts of record presents a question of law subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29625 - 2007-07-10
). Application of a statute to the facts of record presents a question of law subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29625 - 2007-07-10
State v. Joseph Williams
. Whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial are issues of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11241 - 2005-03-31
. Whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial are issues of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11241 - 2005-03-31