Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20691 - 20700 of 39047 for probate forms.

State v. Chad J. Knoll
restitution within the three years of his probation. Therefore, it awarded Foust partial restitution. Knoll
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15739 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Eddie Cannon v. Milwaukee County Sheriff's Department
of Wisconsin probation and parole agents, together with members of the Milwaukee County Sheriff's Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7768 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was on probation for possession of narcotic drugs. This observation later turned out to be incorrect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194088 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
girlfriend at that time. However, Mr. Koll was sentenced to probation, fined and ordered to undergo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36099 - 2009-04-07

COURT OF APPEALS
successful completion of probation. Dawson, 276 Wis. 2d 418, ¶2. Dawson’s agreement to an unconferrable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36676 - 2009-06-09

CA Blank Order
Division of Children and Family Services; Kenya Mason, L.K.F.’s probation and parole officer; and Kari
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145380 - 2015-07-27

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
was fourteen. Boettcher pled no contest to felony sexual assault and received ten years’ probation and six
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28323 - 2007-03-05

State v. Timothy B. Sullivan
months of extended supervision on the false imprisonment charge, and three years of probation on the lewd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5784 - 2005-03-31

State v. Charles R. C.
was on probation at the time this offense occurred and the pattern of his behavior. See State v. Tew, 54 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6975 - 2005-03-31

State v. Guy N. Giese
probation term imposed was an erroneous exercise of the sentencing court’s discretion. No postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10925 - 2005-03-31