Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2071 - 2080 of 3963 for davi.
Search results 2071 - 2080 of 3963 for davi.
[PDF]
State v. Willie S. Gray, Jr.
witnesses, Christina Gray and Jerome Davis, “would testify as to the location of the defendant during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14056 - 2014-09-15
witnesses, Christina Gray and Jerome Davis, “would testify as to the location of the defendant during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14056 - 2014-09-15
Lind Excavating & Landscaping, LLC v. David Cihlar
is uncontroverted.” Davis v. Psychology Examining Bd., 146 Wis. 2d 595, 602, 431 N.W.2d 730 (Ct. App. 1988). [4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19767 - 2005-10-04
is uncontroverted.” Davis v. Psychology Examining Bd., 146 Wis. 2d 595, 602, 431 N.W.2d 730 (Ct. App. 1988). [4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19767 - 2005-10-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Affirmed. Before Neubauer, C.J., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. Per curiam opinions may not be cited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282060 - 2020-08-27
. Affirmed. Before Neubauer, C.J., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. Per curiam opinions may not be cited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282060 - 2020-08-27
[PDF]
State v. Andre D.W.
-APPELLANT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: J. MAC DAVIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13343 - 2017-09-21
-APPELLANT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: J. MAC DAVIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13343 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. #2018CV1882) Before Reilly, P.J., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. Summary disposition orders may not be cited
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=331333 - 2021-02-03
. #2018CV1882) Before Reilly, P.J., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. Summary disposition orders may not be cited
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=331333 - 2021-02-03
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
right to present a defense does not entitle him to present evidence that is irrelevant. See Davis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15521 - 2005-03-31
right to present a defense does not entitle him to present evidence that is irrelevant. See Davis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15521 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
right to present a defense does not entitle him to present evidence that is irrelevant. See Davis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31
right to present a defense does not entitle him to present evidence that is irrelevant. See Davis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
.” For a discussion of the two tests see State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶¶31, 34, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d 823
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34069 - 2014-09-15
.” For a discussion of the two tests see State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶¶31, 34, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d 823
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34069 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
Amendment and whether a sentence was excessive are virtually identical in Wisconsin.” State v. Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55648 - 2014-09-15
Amendment and whether a sentence was excessive are virtually identical in Wisconsin.” State v. Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55648 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. Davis, 2011 WI App 74, ¶13, 333 Wis. 2d 490, 798 N.W.2d 902 (“As a general matter, it is unacceptable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88804 - 2012-10-29
. Davis, 2011 WI App 74, ¶13, 333 Wis. 2d 490, 798 N.W.2d 902 (“As a general matter, it is unacceptable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88804 - 2012-10-29