Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2071 - 2080 of 66464 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 2071 - 2080 of 66464 for motion to dismiss.
State v. Joe J. Davis
was currently serving. ¶6 Davis filed a motion to withdraw his no contest plea and dismiss the criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2256 - 2005-03-31
was currently serving. ¶6 Davis filed a motion to withdraw his no contest plea and dismiss the criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2256 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joe J. Davis
was currently serving. ¶6 Davis filed a motion to withdraw his no contest plea and dismiss the criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16308 - 2005-03-31
was currently serving. ¶6 Davis filed a motion to withdraw his no contest plea and dismiss the criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16308 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joe J. Davis
, filed a motion to dismiss all the criminal charges with prejudice because the State had not brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2256 - 2017-09-19
, filed a motion to dismiss all the criminal charges with prejudice because the State had not brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2256 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Joe J. Davis
, filed a motion to dismiss all the criminal charges with prejudice because the State had not brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16308 - 2017-09-21
, filed a motion to dismiss all the criminal charges with prejudice because the State had not brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16308 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The circuit court held a hearing on the motion, granted the extension for thirty days, and dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194404 - 2017-09-21
. The circuit court held a hearing on the motion, granted the extension for thirty days, and dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194404 - 2017-09-21
State v. Peter Jay Bartram
, the court agreed that the State had acted vindictively and granted Bartram’s motion to dismiss. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15790 - 2005-03-31
, the court agreed that the State had acted vindictively and granted Bartram’s motion to dismiss. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15790 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the order dismissing John’s action and deny the motion to have the appeal declared frivolous. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63749 - 2014-09-15
the order dismissing John’s action and deny the motion to have the appeal declared frivolous. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63749 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Peter Jay Bartram
, and on the State’s motion, the court dismissed the original possession with intent to deliver charge, without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15790 - 2017-09-21
, and on the State’s motion, the court dismissed the original possession with intent to deliver charge, without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15790 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 118
to a hit-and-run felony in return for a “dismissal outright” of a negligent homicide by use of a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36880 - 2014-09-15
to a hit-and-run felony in return for a “dismissal outright” of a negligent homicide by use of a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36880 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 118
to plead guilty to a hit-and-run felony in return for a “dismissal outright” of a negligent homicide by use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36880 - 2009-08-25
to plead guilty to a hit-and-run felony in return for a “dismissal outright” of a negligent homicide by use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36880 - 2009-08-25