Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20701 - 20710 of 29823 for des.
Search results 20701 - 20710 of 29823 for des.
2008 WI APP 15
of law that we review de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d at 128, 449 N.W.2d at 848. Finally, we need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31309 - 2008-01-29
of law that we review de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d at 128, 449 N.W.2d at 848. Finally, we need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31309 - 2008-01-29
Patrick J. Brick v. Janet O'Brien-Brick
. Our review of summary judgment is de novo. Grosskopf Oil, Inc. v. Winter, 156 Wis.2d 575, 581, 457
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9824 - 2012-02-12
. Our review of summary judgment is de novo. Grosskopf Oil, Inc. v. Winter, 156 Wis.2d 575, 581, 457
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9824 - 2012-02-12
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question for de novo review. Id., ¶8. ¶9 The parties agree that the issue is as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111914 - 2014-05-07
is a question for de novo review. Id., ¶8. ¶9 The parties agree that the issue is as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111914 - 2014-05-07
State v. Albert Jackowski
review of the magistrate’s determination is not de novo, rather, we pay “great deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3169 - 2005-03-31
review of the magistrate’s determination is not de novo, rather, we pay “great deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3169 - 2005-03-31
John G. Kierstyn v. Racine Unified School District
review de novo. See id. at 497, 536 N.W.2d at 182. Public employees are immune
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12553 - 2013-07-02
review de novo. See id. at 497, 536 N.W.2d at 182. Public employees are immune
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12553 - 2013-07-02
[PDF]
Town of Lyndon v. Gilbert D. Jensen
of law subject to de novo review. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin v. Dane County Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19336 - 2017-09-21
of law subject to de novo review. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin v. Dane County Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19336 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 117
Wis. 2d 71, 740 N.W.2d 125. We review the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55013 - 2014-09-15
Wis. 2d 71, 740 N.W.2d 125. We review the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55013 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
to a circuit court’s findings of fact, but we review de novo questions of whether counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32828 - 2014-09-15
to a circuit court’s findings of fact, but we review de novo questions of whether counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32828 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Tammie J. C. v. Robert T. R.
for termination. DISCUSSION Standard of Review. ¶5 We review de novo whether statutory and constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4498 - 2017-09-19
for termination. DISCUSSION Standard of Review. ¶5 We review de novo whether statutory and constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4498 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Taylor Investment Corporation of Wisconsin v. PLL Marquette, LLC
de novo. Id. ¶8 An award of attorney fees under WIS. STAT. § 814.025 is a discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4404 - 2017-09-19
de novo. Id. ¶8 An award of attorney fees under WIS. STAT. § 814.025 is a discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4404 - 2017-09-19