Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20711 - 20720 of 68502 for did.
Search results 20711 - 20720 of 68502 for did.
State v. David G. Alexander
was concerned. Therefore, he testified, the Department of Transportation did not evaluate the Intoxilyzer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11091 - 2005-03-31
was concerned. Therefore, he testified, the Department of Transportation did not evaluate the Intoxilyzer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11091 - 2005-03-31
State v. James D. Jacobson
) (cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1035 (1993). The trial court's findings of what counsel did and the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8556 - 2005-03-31
) (cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1035 (1993). The trial court's findings of what counsel did and the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8556 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dykes G. Jupp
. Jupp did not testify at his trial. His unexplained possession of recently stolen goods raises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5004 - 2005-03-31
. Jupp did not testify at his trial. His unexplained possession of recently stolen goods raises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5004 - 2005-03-31
HMO of Wisconsin v. Shane T. Handley
% at fault and Handley was 10% at fault. This settlement did not include HMO. Handley was aware that HMO
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10361 - 2005-03-31
% at fault and Handley was 10% at fault. This settlement did not include HMO. Handley was aware that HMO
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10361 - 2005-03-31
State v. Marcus A. Farina
court erred and “misapplied the law of refusal” when it found that the arresting officer did not comply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2422 - 2005-03-31
court erred and “misapplied the law of refusal” when it found that the arresting officer did not comply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2422 - 2005-03-31
City of Madison v. Timothy J. Duffy
a suppression motion, challenging the underlying stop. He claims that the arresting officer did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16077 - 2005-03-31
a suppression motion, challenging the underlying stop. He claims that the arresting officer did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16077 - 2005-03-31
State v. Morgan Larson
interviewed you, you didn’t admit that you had made up that note, did you? WITNESS: I did not admit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11254 - 2005-03-31
interviewed you, you didn’t admit that you had made up that note, did you? WITNESS: I did not admit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11254 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. When she did not do so, the court denied the motion. Sethi filed a new motion asserting that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72650 - 2014-09-15
. When she did not do so, the court denied the motion. Sethi filed a new motion asserting that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72650 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
complaint, but he testified that it did not matter because the vehicle he stopped had an expired
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116334 - 2017-09-21
complaint, but he testified that it did not matter because the vehicle he stopped had an expired
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116334 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, 2009. The DNA test of the victim’s bite wound did not uncover Hashim’s DNA. Hashim acknowledges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66673 - 2011-06-28
, 2009. The DNA test of the victim’s bite wound did not uncover Hashim’s DNA. Hashim acknowledges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66673 - 2011-06-28