Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20711 - 20720 of 58507 for speedy trial.
Search results 20711 - 20720 of 58507 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CJT & L, Inc. v. Daryl A. Larson
additur and a new trial. We disagree and affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case arises from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21162 - 2017-09-21
additur and a new trial. We disagree and affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case arises from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21162 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
records by Herzfeldt’s dispatcher that Smith did not have a valid 2007 fishing license. ¶3 At trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33784 - 2014-09-15
records by Herzfeldt’s dispatcher that Smith did not have a valid 2007 fishing license. ¶3 At trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33784 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
also claims evidence at trial proved he was entitled to judgment. We affirm. ¶2 Wilson owned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56770 - 2010-11-15
also claims evidence at trial proved he was entitled to judgment. We affirm. ¶2 Wilson owned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56770 - 2010-11-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
trial when it failed to comply with statutory time limits; (2) whether the circuit court erred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105606 - 2017-09-21
trial when it failed to comply with statutory time limits; (2) whether the circuit court erred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105606 - 2017-09-21
State v. John P. McWilliams
HOOVER, P.J.[1] John McWilliams appeals an order denying his motion for a new trial and his conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6367 - 2005-03-31
HOOVER, P.J.[1] John McWilliams appeals an order denying his motion for a new trial and his conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6367 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Garry P. Van De Voort
-2- not responded. The no merit report raises two issues: (1) whether trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10310 - 2017-09-20
-2- not responded. The no merit report raises two issues: (1) whether trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10310 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
) The trial court’s calculation of the child support arrears included a typographical error. The correct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36693 - 2009-06-03
) The trial court’s calculation of the child support arrears included a typographical error. The correct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36693 - 2009-06-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the evidence, and we affirm his conviction. BACKGROUND ¶2 Sonnenberg’s testimony at his court trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87060 - 2014-09-15
of the evidence, and we affirm his conviction. BACKGROUND ¶2 Sonnenberg’s testimony at his court trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87060 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of a firearm after a jury trial. Prior to trial, Hart pled no contest to two additional counts, possession
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977902 - 2025-07-02
of a firearm after a jury trial. Prior to trial, Hart pled no contest to two additional counts, possession
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977902 - 2025-07-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a request to refund an overpayment. On March 4, 2013, he petitioned the trial court for a writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116156 - 2017-09-21
a request to refund an overpayment. On March 4, 2013, he petitioned the trial court for a writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116156 - 2017-09-21