Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20711 - 20720 of 58312 for speedy trial.
Search results 20711 - 20720 of 58312 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Shawn N. v. Tammy N.
placement, the trial court made several references to a statutory presumption of equal physical placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3308 - 2017-09-19
placement, the trial court made several references to a statutory presumption of equal physical placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3308 - 2017-09-19
State v. Torea L. Mitchell
. Torea Mitchell appeals a judgment of conviction. The issue is whether the trial court properly denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2200 - 2005-03-31
. Torea Mitchell appeals a judgment of conviction. The issue is whether the trial court properly denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2200 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
STATE OF WISCONSIN, CIRCUIT COURT,
SC-517, 09/24 Demand for Trial and Instructions (Small Claims) §799.207(2), Wisconsin
/formdisplay/SC-517.pdf?formNumber=SC-517&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-03-10
SC-517, 09/24 Demand for Trial and Instructions (Small Claims) §799.207(2), Wisconsin
/formdisplay/SC-517.pdf?formNumber=SC-517&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-03-10
Shawn N. v. Tammy N.
. In setting the periods of physical placement, the trial court made several references to a statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3308 - 2005-03-31
. In setting the periods of physical placement, the trial court made several references to a statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3308 - 2005-03-31
Bradley Bolden v. Gordon Kottke
, however, because the jury found them contributorily negligent. On appeal, they contend that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13598 - 2005-03-31
, however, because the jury found them contributorily negligent. On appeal, they contend that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13598 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bandar A.
to a first-degree reckless homicide and ordering that he be returned to Saudi Arabia.[1] Because the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11629 - 2005-03-31
to a first-degree reckless homicide and ordering that he be returned to Saudi Arabia.[1] Because the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11629 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Stanley E. Andrews v. Dona M. Andrews
of the divorce judgment.1 The trial court ordered $250 monthly payments until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10276 - 2017-09-20
of the divorce judgment.1 The trial court ordered $250 monthly payments until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10276 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Bandar A.
that he be returned to Saudi Arabia.1 Because the trial court has no authority to order Bandar’s return
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11629 - 2017-09-19
that he be returned to Saudi Arabia.1 Because the trial court has no authority to order Bandar’s return
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11629 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Bradley Bolden v. Gordon Kottke
, however, because the jury found them contributorily negligent. On appeal, they contend that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13598 - 2017-09-21
, however, because the jury found them contributorily negligent. On appeal, they contend that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13598 - 2017-09-21
State v. Glenn H. Hale
of first-degree intentional homicide, party to a crime.[1] Hale asserts that he is entitled to a new trial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16722 - 2005-03-31
of first-degree intentional homicide, party to a crime.[1] Hale asserts that he is entitled to a new trial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16722 - 2005-03-31