Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20721 - 20730 of 30242 for de.
Search results 20721 - 20730 of 30242 for de.
Amber J.F. v. Richard B.
preclusion apply to an undisputed set of facts is a question of law which this court reviews de novo, without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9727 - 2005-03-31
preclusion apply to an undisputed set of facts is a question of law which this court reviews de novo, without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9727 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert M. May
, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. at 310, 548
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14734 - 2005-03-31
, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. at 310, 548
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14734 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI App 35
assistance is a question of law that we decide de novo. See State v. Schmidt, 2004 WI App 235, ¶13, 277 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35499 - 2009-03-24
assistance is a question of law that we decide de novo. See State v. Schmidt, 2004 WI App 235, ¶13, 277 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35499 - 2009-03-24
2008 WI APP 55
. 2d at 413-14. We review an agency’s conclusions of law and interpretation of statutes de novo where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32022 - 2008-04-29
. 2d at 413-14. We review an agency’s conclusions of law and interpretation of statutes de novo where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32022 - 2008-04-29
[PDF]
State v. Anthony James Daniels
a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However, if the motion fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10370 - 2017-09-20
a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However, if the motion fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10370 - 2017-09-20
Doris Hanson v. Kelly M. Sangermano
review de novo. Id. Under § 814.025(3)(a), Stats., a defense is frivolous when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10914 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. Id. Under § 814.025(3)(a), Stats., a defense is frivolous when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10914 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
secure summer employment, the income would be de minimus. We conclude that the trial court’s analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31459 - 2014-09-15
secure summer employment, the income would be de minimus. We conclude that the trial court’s analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31459 - 2014-09-15
John G. Kierstyn v. Racine Unified School District
review de novo. See id. at 497, 536 N.W.2d at 182. Public employees are immune
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12553 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See id. at 497, 536 N.W.2d at 182. Public employees are immune
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12553 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2017AP486 8 we review de novo. “When material facts are undisputed, the question presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213609 - 2018-05-30
No. 2017AP486 8 we review de novo. “When material facts are undisputed, the question presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213609 - 2018-05-30
[PDF]
Jacquie Hur v. Laverne Holler
review the type of sanctions available under § 804.12, STATS., de novo. However, determinations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10168 - 2017-09-19
review the type of sanctions available under § 804.12, STATS., de novo. However, determinations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10168 - 2017-09-19