Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20721 - 20730 of 68502 for did.
Search results 20721 - 20730 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, was invalid because he did not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waive his right to counsel before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=831490 - 2024-07-31
, was invalid because he did not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waive his right to counsel before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=831490 - 2024-07-31
[PDF]
State v. Luis Vasquez
five times while holding the gun to Ericson’s head. Because the gun did not fire, Vasquez told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3886 - 2017-09-20
five times while holding the gun to Ericson’s head. Because the gun did not fire, Vasquez told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3886 - 2017-09-20
Robert M. Pace v. Circuit Court for Oneida County
all issues but one: We held that the Paces did not have to exhaust administrative remedies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13500 - 2005-03-31
all issues but one: We held that the Paces did not have to exhaust administrative remedies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13500 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Marcus A. Farina
” when it found that the arresting officer did not comply with the intent of WIS. STAT. § 343.305(4).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2422 - 2017-09-19
” when it found that the arresting officer did not comply with the intent of WIS. STAT. § 343.305(4).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2422 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
County of Dunn v. Laurence E. Eccles
the trial court’s express finding that Eccles was capable of understanding and did understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13041 - 2017-09-21
the trial court’s express finding that Eccles was capable of understanding and did understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13041 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David W.C.
performance did not prejudice the defense, we affirm the judgments and order. ¶2 David was initially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15655 - 2017-09-21
performance did not prejudice the defense, we affirm the judgments and order. ¶2 David was initially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15655 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
against her. We conclude the circuit court did not err, and we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On May 8, 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70087 - 2014-09-15
against her. We conclude the circuit court did not err, and we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On May 8, 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70087 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
someone whose name he did not know. Gould subsequently changed his story and provided a written
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=534980 - 2022-06-22
someone whose name he did not know. Gould subsequently changed his story and provided a written
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=534980 - 2022-06-22
[PDF]
State v. Raymond F. Gose
. Because we conclude that the trial court did not err, we affirm. The charges against Gose arose out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10526 - 2017-09-20
. Because we conclude that the trial court did not err, we affirm. The charges against Gose arose out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10526 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Fernando R. Salinas
misinterpreted Salinas’s juvenile record. We conclude that the court did not do so, and therefore, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20482 - 2017-09-21
misinterpreted Salinas’s juvenile record. We conclude that the court did not do so, and therefore, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20482 - 2017-09-21