Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20731 - 20740 of 98582 for civil court case status online.
Search results 20731 - 20740 of 98582 for civil court case status online.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from two cases that were consolidated for trial. In Milwaukee County Circuit Court case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211718 - 2018-05-01
from two cases that were consolidated for trial. In Milwaukee County Circuit Court case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211718 - 2018-05-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. BACKGROUND ¶2 In Douglas County Circuit Court case No. 2012CF143, the State charged Birkholz with twenty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241830 - 2019-06-11
. BACKGROUND ¶2 In Douglas County Circuit Court case No. 2012CF143, the State charged Birkholz with twenty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241830 - 2019-06-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The circuit court determined, after reading the briefs and the cited case law, that the word “shall” used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88770 - 2014-09-15
The circuit court determined, after reading the briefs and the cited case law, that the word “shall” used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88770 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Accordingly, our supreme court has explained that sub. (1) only applies in cases involving “a child
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231818 - 2019-01-04
. Accordingly, our supreme court has explained that sub. (1) only applies in cases involving “a child
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231818 - 2019-01-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 17, 2020 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=304603 - 2020-11-17
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 17, 2020 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=304603 - 2020-11-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
¶6 The case was subsequently transferred to a different branch of the circuit court. In April 2011
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117594 - 2017-09-21
¶6 The case was subsequently transferred to a different branch of the circuit court. In April 2011
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117594 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the case,” even though the court did not recite those words verbatim. As noted, the court ultimately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=825006 - 2024-07-11
of the case,” even though the court did not recite those words verbatim. As noted, the court ultimately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=825006 - 2024-07-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as the circuit court, unless otherwise noted. 3 Cases appealed under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.107 “shall be given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235463 - 2019-02-20
as the circuit court, unless otherwise noted. 3 Cases appealed under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.107 “shall be given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235463 - 2019-02-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
case that (1) the trial court violated its mandatory duties under WIS. STAT. § 48.422(7) and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186969 - 2017-09-21
case that (1) the trial court violated its mandatory duties under WIS. STAT. § 48.422(7) and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186969 - 2017-09-21
State v. Charles W. Randle
decision of the Wisconsin Supreme Court of State of Wisconsin v. David C. Liebnitz Case No. 98-2182
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2202 - 2005-03-31
decision of the Wisconsin Supreme Court of State of Wisconsin v. David C. Liebnitz Case No. 98-2182
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2202 - 2005-03-31