Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20731 - 20740 of 68485 for did.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
enforcement had received previous calls about Cleary’s drunk driving. The deputy did not locate the truck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142368 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
should have suppressed evidence obtained following a traffic stop because the arresting officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162218 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
driveway just as Janiak was entering his home. Thomson ordered Janiak to stop, but he did not comply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31425 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 23, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Ap...
conclude, as did the trial judge, that the improper statement during testimony was a harmless error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88561 - 2012-10-22

COURT OF APPEALS
to the land did not convey land within the 66-foot right-of-way. ¶5 In reaching this conclusion, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34253 - 2008-10-08

COURT OF APPEALS
since the remaining trial testimony did not involve sexually explicit facts. The nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62520 - 2011-04-12

[PDF] State v. Mark Alan Szarkowitz
motion, Szarkowitz also challenged the validity of a repeater enhancement to his sentence. He did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6163 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
respect to the gravity and seriousness of the offense.” If Berry did not want to enter a plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131977 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. When she did not do so, the court denied the motion. Sethi filed a new motion asserting that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72650 - 2014-09-15

Graham L. Smith v. Pamela Mae Smith
was not required to “divest and transfer the title” of the business. Nor did the statute prohibit the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18313 - 2005-05-25