Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20731 - 20740 of 66464 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 20731 - 20740 of 66464 for motion to dismiss.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion to withdraw his plea, which rested on the same grounds, results in a manifest injustice. ¶2 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69454 - 2014-09-15
motion to withdraw his plea, which rested on the same grounds, results in a manifest injustice. ¶2 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69454 - 2014-09-15
State v. Tony M. Smith
postconviction motion. Smith seeks resentencing on the grounds that his counsel provided ineffective assistance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16974 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion. Smith seeks resentencing on the grounds that his counsel provided ineffective assistance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16974 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Ursulean argues that the circuit court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence discovered during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078712 - 2026-02-17
Ursulean argues that the circuit court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence discovered during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078712 - 2026-02-17
[PDF]
State v. Robert A. Rushing
. We conclude that the evidence was sufficient to sustain a finding of guilt; therefore, dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8736 - 2017-09-19
. We conclude that the evidence was sufficient to sustain a finding of guilt; therefore, dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8736 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert A. Rushing
. We conclude that the evidence was sufficient to sustain a finding of guilt; therefore, dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8736 - 2005-03-31
. We conclude that the evidence was sufficient to sustain a finding of guilt; therefore, dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8736 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
of conviction and the circuit court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence.1
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=593927 - 2022-11-23
of conviction and the circuit court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence.1
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=593927 - 2022-11-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
dismissal. He states that after discussing this matter with the Office of the State Public Defender, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909657 - 2025-02-04
dismissal. He states that after discussing this matter with the Office of the State Public Defender, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909657 - 2025-02-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
dismissal. He states that after discussing this matter with the Office of the State Public Defender, he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909657 - 2025-02-04
dismissal. He states that after discussing this matter with the Office of the State Public Defender, he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909657 - 2025-02-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶1 SHERMAN, J. 1 Glendale Stewart, pro se, appeals a small claims court order dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100524 - 2017-09-21
. ¶1 SHERMAN, J. 1 Glendale Stewart, pro se, appeals a small claims court order dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100524 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appeals an order dismissing her complaint. After Gremminger filed a brief, none of the respondents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=736883 - 2023-12-07
appeals an order dismissing her complaint. After Gremminger filed a brief, none of the respondents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=736883 - 2023-12-07