Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20731 - 20740 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 20731 - 20740 of 58492 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
appeal pro se from the judgment of the circuit court entered against them after a jury trial. They argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28812 - 2007-06-19
appeal pro se from the judgment of the circuit court entered against them after a jury trial. They argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28812 - 2007-06-19
Virginia Leet v. Michael J. Guy
The plaintiffs substituted counsel before trial. The case was tried to the court on the plaintiffs’ prescriptive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7203 - 2005-03-31
The plaintiffs substituted counsel before trial. The case was tried to the court on the plaintiffs’ prescriptive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7203 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 13, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
mother on the grounds that it was the “least restrictive alternative.” The trial court held, inter alia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27399 - 2006-12-12
mother on the grounds that it was the “least restrictive alternative.” The trial court held, inter alia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27399 - 2006-12-12
State v. Charles R. Seibel
. He contends that the trial court erred when it rejected his proposed revision to the standard OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6857 - 2005-03-31
. He contends that the trial court erred when it rejected his proposed revision to the standard OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6857 - 2005-03-31
Irene Stussy v. North Crawford School District
personal injury complaint against the Town of Utica.[1] The issues are whether the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15084 - 2005-03-31
personal injury complaint against the Town of Utica.[1] The issues are whether the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15084 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joseph Gilmore
trial because the trial court excluded evidence regarding the credibility of the principal witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8519 - 2017-09-19
trial because the trial court excluded evidence regarding the credibility of the principal witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8519 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
its discretion by admitting other acts evidence against him. He further contends that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109240 - 2017-09-21
its discretion by admitting other acts evidence against him. He further contends that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109240 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael H. Coppens
. On March 20, a final pre-trial conference was held and the case was set for trial on April 19, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2957 - 2017-09-19
. On March 20, a final pre-trial conference was held and the case was set for trial on April 19, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2957 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael H. Coppens
. On March 20, a final pre-trial conference was held and the case was set for trial on April 19, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2956 - 2017-09-19
. On March 20, a final pre-trial conference was held and the case was set for trial on April 19, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2956 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Raymond T. Bradley
§ 939.62(1)(b).1 He also appeals an order denying him postconviction relief. He argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2909 - 2017-09-19
§ 939.62(1)(b).1 He also appeals an order denying him postconviction relief. He argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2909 - 2017-09-19