Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20741 - 20750 of 83477 for civil case no. "90-77".
Search results 20741 - 20750 of 83477 for civil case no. "90-77".
[PDF]
State v. Bill Paul Marquardt
Appeal Nos. 04-0958-CR 04-1609-CR Cir. Ct. Nos. 00CF000104 00CF000137 WISCONSIN
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1232 - 2017-09-19
Appeal Nos. 04-0958-CR 04-1609-CR Cir. Ct. Nos. 00CF000104 00CF000137 WISCONSIN
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1232 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. James O. Edwards
2002 WI App 66 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-0612-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3684 - 2017-09-19
2002 WI App 66 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-0612-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3684 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
with a lawsuit filed by his former business partner (“the Bishop case”).1 Sparbel incurred more than $79,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36186 - 2014-09-15
with a lawsuit filed by his former business partner (“the Bishop case”).1 Sparbel incurred more than $79,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36186 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
.[2] ¶3 In the present case, RTS sued Group to recover on a $67,500 promissory note, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102979 - 2013-10-14
.[2] ¶3 In the present case, RTS sued Group to recover on a $67,500 promissory note, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102979 - 2013-10-14
COURT OF APPEALS
theft. ¶3 The facts in this case are contested; however, challenges to the sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123444 - 2014-10-06
theft. ¶3 The facts in this case are contested; however, challenges to the sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123444 - 2014-10-06
State v. Joseph P. DeFilippo
2005 WI App 213 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP515-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19197 - 2005-09-19
2005 WI App 213 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP515-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19197 - 2005-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
representation of Thomas in this case. For that reason, she contends the circuit court erred when it denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232745 - 2019-01-15
representation of Thomas in this case. For that reason, she contends the circuit court erred when it denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232745 - 2019-01-15
[PDF]
Office of State Public Defenders v. Circuit Court for Dunn County
sanction. This case arises out of a circuit court action, State v. Creaser, No. 97-CF-119, in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14125 - 2014-09-15
sanction. This case arises out of a circuit court action, State v. Creaser, No. 97-CF-119, in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14125 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Joseph P. DeFilippo
2005 WI APP 213 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP515-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19197 - 2017-09-21
2005 WI APP 213 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP515-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19197 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kimberly Sotelo
Belton2 bright-line rule, the police officer's search in this case did not violate the Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9223 - 2017-09-19
Belton2 bright-line rule, the police officer's search in this case did not violate the Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9223 - 2017-09-19