Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20741 - 20750 of 30242 for de.

John C. Hagen v. City of Milwaukee Employee's Retirement System Annuity and Pension Board
the circuit court's grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Green
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16571 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
that we review de novo. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53. If, however, the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31019 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law which we review de novo. Weber v. City of Cedarburg, 129 Wis. 2d 57, 64, 384 N.W.2d 333
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34227 - 2008-10-06

Ronald D. Tym v. Helen M. Ludwig
is entitled to judgment as a matter of law is a question of law which we review de novo. Smith v. State Farm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8219 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI App 35
is a question of law that we decide de novo. See State v. Schmidt, 2004 WI App 235, ¶13, 277 Wis. 2d 561, 691
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35499 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
presents a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. See State v. Clayton W. Williams
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377016 - 2021-06-16

State v. Carlos L. Vasquez
review de novo. State v. Hansen, 168 Wis.2d 749, 755, 485 N.W.2d 74, 77 (Ct. App. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9970 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Umansky v. ABC Ins. Co., 2009 WI 82, ¶8, 319 Wis. 2d 622
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118463 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
facts which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135542 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Thomas G. Nejedlo v. School District of Wausaukee
court and our review is de novo. 3 See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18378 - 2017-09-21