Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20741 - 20750 of 29740 for des.

William E. Marberry v. Phillip G. Macht
, and now reverse. II. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶8 We apply a de novo standard of review to legal issues
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17551 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI App 36
a question of law we review de novo. See Teague v. Bad River Band of Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190431 - 2018-02-13

[PDF] Frontsheet
of law we review de novo. PRN Assocs. LLC v. DOA, 2009 WI 53, ¶25, 317 Wis. 2d 656, 766 N.W.2d 559
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240994 - 2019-05-23

[PDF] State v. Edward F. Topping
of this case presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Koeppen I, 195 Wis. 2d at 126. ¶16 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3633 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 51
de novo, while whether the new factor justifies a modification of sentence involves the exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170288 - 2017-09-21

State v. Clyde Baily Williams
standards and principles to those facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶33
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6235 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Habermehl Electric, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
an interpretation of a statute, we review that legal issue de novo. Goff v. Seldera, 202 Wis. 2d 600, 616, 550
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5347 - 2017-09-19

2009 WI APP 57
that this court reviews de novo. Torgerson v. Journal/Sentinel, Inc., 210 Wis. 2d 524, 536, 563 N.W.2d 472 (1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36168 - 2009-11-17

[PDF] Richard F. Modica v. Doug Verhulst
decides de novo, without deference to the trial court's determination. Tahtinen v. MSI Ins. Co., 122 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8188 - 2017-09-19

Western Wisconsin Water, Inc. v. Quality Beverages of Wisconsin, Inc.
We review the granting or denial of motions for summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7174 - 2005-03-31