Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20741 - 20750 of 63968 for records/1000.
Search results 20741 - 20750 of 63968 for records/1000.
State v. Antroy T. McGee
allegations, or when the record conclusively demonstrates that he is not entitled to relief. Nelson v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26534 - 2006-09-20
allegations, or when the record conclusively demonstrates that he is not entitled to relief. Nelson v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26534 - 2006-09-20
[PDF]
Marathon County Department of Social Services v. Terri L.
in finding that the fourth condition had not been satisfied. They cite evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12314 - 2017-09-21
in finding that the fourth condition had not been satisfied. They cite evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12314 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110011 - 2014-04-08
. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110011 - 2014-04-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. We summarily affirm. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071608 - 2026-02-04
of the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. We summarily affirm. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071608 - 2026-02-04
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
jurisdiction. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1073006 - 2026-02-04
jurisdiction. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1073006 - 2026-02-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231117 - 2018-12-26
. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231117 - 2018-12-26
COURT OF APPEALS
on the record. Id., ¶¶8, 38. Additionally, a defendant has a constitutional due process right to be sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37744 - 2009-07-15
on the record. Id., ¶¶8, 38. Additionally, a defendant has a constitutional due process right to be sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37744 - 2009-07-15
[PDF]
State v. Daniel N.P.
process based on the application of the correct legal standards to the record facts. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16180 - 2017-09-21
process based on the application of the correct legal standards to the record facts. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16180 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frederick Rogers v. DOC
no basis in the record to conclude that the department’s motion to dismiss was either untimely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21703 - 2017-09-21
no basis in the record to conclude that the department’s motion to dismiss was either untimely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21703 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Daniel N.P.
process based on the application of the correct legal standards to the record facts. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16181 - 2017-09-21
process based on the application of the correct legal standards to the record facts. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16181 - 2017-09-21