Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20751 - 20760 of 64991 for or b.

Daniel Harr v. Gerald Berge
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: paul b. higginbotham, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6929 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Douglass Potter
acid analysis surcharge of $250: (a) The person violated s. 940.225 or 948.02 (1) or (2). (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6662 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, the officer shall direct the administering of the test. A blood test is subject to par. (b). The person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189490 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
of second-degree sexual assault of a child, all involving Jasmine B., the thirteen-year-old daughter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34847 - 2014-09-15

Wauwatosa School District v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh
District named in Item 1 of the Declarations. EXCLUSIONS This policy does not apply: …. b) to any claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12963 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
alcohol concentration in violation of § 940.09(1)(b). Hampton’s counsel did not file a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236555 - 2019-03-07

COURT OF APPEALS
of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(b). McDonald contends that the circuit court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56842 - 2010-11-17

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 25, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
Stat. § 938.18(5)(b) directs the court to consider the type and seriousness of the offense, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26894 - 2006-10-24

[PDF] Julie L. Rabideau v. City of Racine
from a judgment of the circuit court for Racine County: ALLAN B. TORHORST, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16313 - 2017-09-21

Alan Derzon v. New Oji Paper Company, Ltd.
to the moving party’s notice after trial; and (b) The moving party’s failure to discover the evidence earlier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15562 - 2005-03-31