Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20751 - 20760 of 91523 for police arresting judge 2 part.
Search results 20751 - 20760 of 91523 for police arresting judge 2 part.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: Michael D. Guolee, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101932 - 2013-09-23
of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: Michael D. Guolee, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101932 - 2013-09-23
[PDF]
State v. David A. Porth, Sr.
appeals. 3 2 The judge at the jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4539 - 2017-09-20
appeals. 3 2 The judge at the jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4539 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. O'Connor Pickle
a judgment of the circuit court for Kenosha County: DAVID M. BASTIANELLI, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16072 - 2017-09-21
a judgment of the circuit court for Kenosha County: DAVID M. BASTIANELLI, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16072 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. No. 2019AP202 2 On December 3, 2013, then-Milwaukee Police Chief Edward Flynn discharged Gomez
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255911 - 2020-03-11
. No. 2019AP202 2 On December 3, 2013, then-Milwaukee Police Chief Edward Flynn discharged Gomez
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255911 - 2020-03-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
a judgment of the circuit court for St. Croix County: SCOTT R. NEEDHAM, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33879 - 2014-09-15
a judgment of the circuit court for St. Croix County: SCOTT R. NEEDHAM, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33879 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
.[2] The facts before the court were primarily limited to those alleged in the police reports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33879 - 2008-09-02
.[2] The facts before the court were primarily limited to those alleged in the police reports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33879 - 2008-09-02
COURT OF APPEALS
testified she did not remember Howard’s words when she spoke to police. The administrative law judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63156 - 2011-04-25
testified she did not remember Howard’s words when she spoke to police. The administrative law judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63156 - 2011-04-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
such an argument. The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) agreed, explaining in relevant part: In their brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147002 - 2017-09-21
such an argument. The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) agreed, explaining in relevant part: In their brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147002 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. We affirm the judgment. ¶2 The Appleton Police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289730 - 2020-09-23
that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. We affirm the judgment. ¶2 The Appleton Police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289730 - 2020-09-23
[PDF]
State v. Anthony J. Leitner
Submitted on Briefs: January 5, 2001 JUDGES: Vergeront, Deininger and Lundsten, JJ. Concurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2737 - 2017-09-19
Submitted on Briefs: January 5, 2001 JUDGES: Vergeront, Deininger and Lundsten, JJ. Concurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2737 - 2017-09-19