Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20761 - 20770 of 68274 for did.
Search results 20761 - 20770 of 68274 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
, Tolefree’s plea acknowledged his knowing receipt of proceeds from a bank robbery. ¶4 Tolefree did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29959 - 2007-08-13
, Tolefree’s plea acknowledged his knowing receipt of proceeds from a bank robbery. ¶4 Tolefree did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29959 - 2007-08-13
COURT OF APPEALS
. Blum did not pass the tests, and Officer Bartels arrested him for operating a motor vehicle while under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36830 - 2009-06-17
. Blum did not pass the tests, and Officer Bartels arrested him for operating a motor vehicle while under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36830 - 2009-06-17
State v. Bruce A. Rumage
to the verdict form for Count 3, the court did not highlight that the charge related to oral intercourse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12093 - 2013-07-15
to the verdict form for Count 3, the court did not highlight that the charge related to oral intercourse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12093 - 2013-07-15
State v. David G. Alexander
was concerned. Therefore, he testified, the Department of Transportation did not evaluate the Intoxilyzer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11091 - 2005-03-31
was concerned. Therefore, he testified, the Department of Transportation did not evaluate the Intoxilyzer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11091 - 2005-03-31
State v. Karen A. Salm
facts in this case are undisputed. Salm did not testify at her implied consent refusal hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4373 - 2005-03-31
facts in this case are undisputed. Salm did not testify at her implied consent refusal hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4373 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Karen A. Salm
¶2 The relevant facts in this case are undisputed. Salm did not testify at her implied consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4373 - 2017-09-19
¶2 The relevant facts in this case are undisputed. Salm did not testify at her implied consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4373 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Dale W. Repinski
counsel did discuss the consequences of consolidation with Repinski and made a reasonable strategic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10180 - 2017-09-19
counsel did discuss the consequences of consolidation with Repinski and made a reasonable strategic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10180 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Anthony A. Suslick
determined that while he was mentally ill at the time of the crimes, he did not meet the other criteria
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2836 - 2017-09-19
determined that while he was mentally ill at the time of the crimes, he did not meet the other criteria
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2836 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jose R.
the trial court did not make findings of fact in connection with its denial of Jose R.’s motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19172 - 2005-08-01
the trial court did not make findings of fact in connection with its denial of Jose R.’s motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19172 - 2005-08-01
[PDF]
Graham L. Smith v. Pamela Mae Smith
” of the business. Nor did the statute prohibit the trial court from awarding a partial interest in the business
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18313 - 2017-09-21
” of the business. Nor did the statute prohibit the trial court from awarding a partial interest in the business
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18313 - 2017-09-21