Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20761 - 20770 of 68900 for law.
Search results 20761 - 20770 of 68900 for law.
State v. James Stankiewicz
N.W.2d 830, 833 (1990). The legality of the stop, however, is a question of law and is reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10828 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 830, 833 (1990). The legality of the stop, however, is a question of law and is reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10828 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Francisco Mata
is correct. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law, subject to de novo review. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9054 - 2017-09-19
is correct. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law, subject to de novo review. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9054 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Robert W. Thurston
contradicted established case law. On April 8, 1997, after Thurston responded, the court issued a written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12426 - 2017-09-21
contradicted established case law. On April 8, 1997, after Thurston responded, the court issued a written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12426 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jonathon L. Norton
that the retroactive effect of this law is an impermissible ex post facto violation of article one, sec. 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9505 - 2005-03-31
that the retroactive effect of this law is an impermissible ex post facto violation of article one, sec. 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9505 - 2005-03-31
State v. Peter J. Bartram
entry we are not reviewing the decision of the magistrate. The case law makes it plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15864 - 2005-03-31
entry we are not reviewing the decision of the magistrate. The case law makes it plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15864 - 2005-03-31
State v. David G. Rodenkirch
meets constitutional and statutory standards is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7017 - 2005-03-31
meets constitutional and statutory standards is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7017 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the jurisdictional limits of small claims, and therefore must be dismissed as a matter of law.” However, Spaman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33813 - 2008-08-26
the jurisdictional limits of small claims, and therefore must be dismissed as a matter of law.” However, Spaman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33813 - 2008-08-26
Salwa Rashad v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
,” and apparently neither does case law. The commission found that the work offered to Rashad was suitable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18291 - 2005-05-25
,” and apparently neither does case law. The commission found that the work offered to Rashad was suitable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18291 - 2005-05-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
raised a new issue “presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Edwards
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194148 - 2017-09-21
raised a new issue “presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Edwards
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194148 - 2017-09-21
Rickly Wesley v. The City of Milwaukee
and imperative, involving merely the performance of a specific task when the law imposes, prescribes and defines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11700 - 2005-03-31
and imperative, involving merely the performance of a specific task when the law imposes, prescribes and defines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11700 - 2005-03-31