Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20761 - 20770 of 63968 for records/1000.
Search results 20761 - 20770 of 63968 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, a supplemental no merit report.2 Upon review of the record and the no- merit reports, we conclude that Hall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830163 - 2024-07-22
, a supplemental no merit report.2 Upon review of the record and the no- merit reports, we conclude that Hall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830163 - 2024-07-22
State v. Larry A. Tiepelman
review of the record, we conclude that the circuit court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5240 - 2005-03-31
review of the record, we conclude that the circuit court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5240 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). 2 In rejecting the motion, the circuit court noted that the case record was still with this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82399 - 2014-09-15
). 2 In rejecting the motion, the circuit court noted that the case record was still with this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82399 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731624 - 2023-11-22
the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731624 - 2023-11-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the sentence on the record. These objectives include, but are not limited to, the protection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74191 - 2014-09-15
of the sentence on the record. These objectives include, but are not limited to, the protection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74191 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CRNM 2 respond. After independently reviewing the record and the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204235 - 2017-11-28
-CRNM 2 respond. After independently reviewing the record and the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204235 - 2017-11-28
State v. Stephen L. Grant
. Grant filed a response. After an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10958 - 2005-03-31
. Grant filed a response. After an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10958 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to the record on appeal, the Geigers insist that an accurate survey would not have disclosed the boundary line
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70333 - 2011-10-09
to the record on appeal, the Geigers insist that an accurate survey would not have disclosed the boundary line
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70333 - 2011-10-09
Kenneth Raymond Rykal v. Sandra Kay Rykal
division if the court gave rational reasons for its decision and based its decision on facts in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3837 - 2005-03-31
division if the court gave rational reasons for its decision and based its decision on facts in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3837 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
’” (the Property). The County of Pepin took title to the Property by a deed recorded on June 2, 1958
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88858 - 2012-10-31
’” (the Property). The County of Pepin took title to the Property by a deed recorded on June 2, 1958
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88858 - 2012-10-31