Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20771 - 20780 of 26423 for marital settlement agreement/1000.
Search results 20771 - 20780 of 26423 for marital settlement agreement/1000.
Brown County v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
The Barland court held that a ”bumping” provision within a collective bargaining agreement could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7375 - 2005-03-31
The Barland court held that a ”bumping” provision within a collective bargaining agreement could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7375 - 2005-03-31
Ryan Cass v. American Home Assurance Company
validity. Specifically, we examine the facts and circumstances of the agreement’ … to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18096 - 2005-05-09
validity. Specifically, we examine the facts and circumstances of the agreement’ … to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18096 - 2005-05-09
[PDF]
Jacqueline M. L. v. Korey D. S.
): a court’s adherence to a paternity agreement entered into by an 18 year-old putative father, without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14782 - 2017-09-21
): a court’s adherence to a paternity agreement entered into by an 18 year-old putative father, without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14782 - 2017-09-21
State v. Justin P. Brandl
for trial, not a suppression hearing. ¶8 Brandl then entered a plea agreement. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26040 - 2006-07-31
for trial, not a suppression hearing. ¶8 Brandl then entered a plea agreement. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26040 - 2006-07-31
COURT OF APPEALS
with a sledgehammer. As part of his plea agreement, Cochran paid $5,000 in restitution upfront, with further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48823 - 2010-04-12
with a sledgehammer. As part of his plea agreement, Cochran paid $5,000 in restitution upfront, with further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48823 - 2010-04-12
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michelle L. Danielson
., retained Attorney Danielson as counsel in an insurance dispute. A written retainer agreement was signed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24947 - 2006-04-27
., retained Attorney Danielson as counsel in an insurance dispute. A written retainer agreement was signed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24947 - 2006-04-27
COURT OF APPEALS
to the State’s alleged violation of the plea agreement, and for failing to raise an issue related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33114 - 2008-06-23
to the State’s alleged violation of the plea agreement, and for failing to raise an issue related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33114 - 2008-06-23
CA Blank Order
admitting their involvement in the robbery to police. Pursuant to a plea agreement, which required
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102447 - 2013-10-01
admitting their involvement in the robbery to police. Pursuant to a plea agreement, which required
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102447 - 2013-10-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as a repeater. Pursuant to a plea agreement, Iseini pled guilty to three counts of delivering heroin
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156447 - 2017-09-21
as a repeater. Pursuant to a plea agreement, Iseini pled guilty to three counts of delivering heroin
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156447 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with the devil. Deal that’s on paper. There was a written agreement between the [S]tate and the devil, Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522082 - 2022-05-17
with the devil. Deal that’s on paper. There was a written agreement between the [S]tate and the devil, Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522082 - 2022-05-17