Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20771 - 20780 of 74518 for public records.
Search results 20771 - 20780 of 74518 for public records.
Marshfield Clinic v. Tennes A. Tulpan
, the clinic does not show that it raised these theories in the trial court, nor does our review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7556 - 2005-03-31
, the clinic does not show that it raised these theories in the trial court, nor does our review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7556 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an order denying his motion for resentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213407 - 2018-05-30
an order denying his motion for resentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213407 - 2018-05-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
, in addition to considering the seriousness of the offenses, the effect on the victims, Malm’s prior record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29419 - 2014-09-15
, in addition to considering the seriousness of the offenses, the effect on the victims, Malm’s prior record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29419 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=759775 - 2024-02-07
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=759775 - 2024-02-07
State v. Robert Hoffa, Jr.
] Hoffa first contends that we should independently review the record to determine whether he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13030 - 2005-03-31
] Hoffa first contends that we should independently review the record to determine whether he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13030 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the judgment under WIS. STAT. § 806.07(1)(h) (2011-12).1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95302 - 2014-09-15
the judgment under WIS. STAT. § 806.07(1)(h) (2011-12).1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95302 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Janesville, WI 53545 William E. Schmaal Asst. State Public Defender P.O. Box 7862 Madison, WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110003 - 2017-09-21
Janesville, WI 53545 William E. Schmaal Asst. State Public Defender P.O. Box 7862 Madison, WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110003 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey J. Ward
to protect the public. See State v. Harris, 119 Wis. 2d 612, 623, 350 N.W.2d 633 (1984). The court noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3138 - 2017-09-19
to protect the public. See State v. Harris, 119 Wis. 2d 612, 623, 350 N.W.2d 633 (1984). The court noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3138 - 2017-09-19
State v. Cesar G.
as a sex offender. This argument has no support in the record. The circuit court assumed it had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5536 - 2005-03-31
as a sex offender. This argument has no support in the record. The circuit court assumed it had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5536 - 2005-03-31
David McIlquham v. County of Chippewa Board of Adjustment
, unreasonable and unsupported by the record.[1] We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3079 - 2005-03-31
, unreasonable and unsupported by the record.[1] We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3079 - 2005-03-31