Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20771 - 20780 of 74557 for public records.
Search results 20771 - 20780 of 74557 for public records.
[PDF]
State v. Toua Yang
offense, the nature of his overall character, the public’s need for protection, and the interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13185 - 2017-09-21
offense, the nature of his overall character, the public’s need for protection, and the interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13185 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Marshfield Clinic v. Tennes A. Tulpan
of the record indicate that it did so. Therefore, we do not address them on appeal. See Terpstra v. Soiltest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7556 - 2017-09-19
of the record indicate that it did so. Therefore, we do not address them on appeal. See Terpstra v. Soiltest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7556 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=759775 - 2024-02-07
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=759775 - 2024-02-07
State v. James W. McMillen
totaling $1300.00. The state public defender appointed Michael J. Devanie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8360 - 2005-03-31
totaling $1300.00. The state public defender appointed Michael J. Devanie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8360 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
factor exists. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155108 - 2017-09-21
factor exists. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155108 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
mootness, we have conducted an independent review of the sentencing record. We agree with the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109245 - 2014-03-18
mootness, we have conducted an independent review of the sentencing record. We agree with the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109245 - 2014-03-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
by the state public defender’s office appeared at the review hearing, held sixteen days after the date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50570 - 2014-09-15
by the state public defender’s office appeared at the review hearing, held sixteen days after the date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50570 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for protection of the public. See State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d 197. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34044 - 2008-09-15
for protection of the public. See State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d 197. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34044 - 2008-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, instead relying upon materials from the Public Defender’s file to find that counsel had successfully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33502 - 2008-07-23
, instead relying upon materials from the Public Defender’s file to find that counsel had successfully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33502 - 2008-07-23
State v. James Martindale
the burden to show unreasonableness from the record. Id. The primary factors to be considered by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21468 - 2006-02-20
the burden to show unreasonableness from the record. Id. The primary factors to be considered by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21468 - 2006-02-20