Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20781 - 20790 of 45851 for WA 0852 2611 9277 Pemborong Set Kamar Lemari Apartment Wisma Gading Permai Jakarta Utara.
Search results 20781 - 20790 of 45851 for WA 0852 2611 9277 Pemborong Set Kamar Lemari Apartment Wisma Gading Permai Jakarta Utara.
State v. Luis M. James
, finding $5,000 was a reasonable amount, that James had demonstrated the ability to set aside money while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12858 - 2005-03-31
, finding $5,000 was a reasonable amount, that James had demonstrated the ability to set aside money while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12858 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michelle L. Dean
considered the impact of Dean’s misconduct on the victims as set out in their letter to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11155 - 2005-03-31
considered the impact of Dean’s misconduct on the victims as set out in their letter to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11155 - 2005-03-31
State v. Henry L. Pierce
with the requirements set forth in State v. Bangert, 131 Wis.2d 246, 261-62, 389 N.W.2d 12, 21 (1986), to ensure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9274 - 2005-03-31
with the requirements set forth in State v. Bangert, 131 Wis.2d 246, 261-62, 389 N.W.2d 12, 21 (1986), to ensure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9274 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
is a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence but not known to the trial judge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92721 - 2013-02-06
is a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence but not known to the trial judge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92721 - 2013-02-06
COURT OF APPEALS
read a different set of elements, but Smith did not testify that he was aware of this difference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44894 - 2009-12-22
read a different set of elements, but Smith did not testify that he was aware of this difference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44894 - 2009-12-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
listed on the judgment with the amounts ordered by the court or with the mandatory DNA surcharge set
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135286 - 2017-09-21
listed on the judgment with the amounts ordered by the court or with the mandatory DNA surcharge set
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135286 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Darrick A. Alexander v. Daniel Benik
. On April 6, 2004, the ICRS appeal resulted in a decision in Alexander’s favor, setting aside the February
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18799 - 2017-09-21
. On April 6, 2004, the ICRS appeal resulted in a decision in Alexander’s favor, setting aside the February
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18799 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. This bar applies even when the defendant’s direct appeal “was processed under the no merit procedure set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84850 - 2014-09-15
. This bar applies even when the defendant’s direct appeal “was processed under the no merit procedure set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84850 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael R. Nelson
. Torres, 2003 WI App 199, ¶5, 267 Wis. 2d 213, 670 N.W.2d 400. “A ‘new factor’ is ‘a fact or set of facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6680 - 2005-03-31
. Torres, 2003 WI App 199, ¶5, 267 Wis. 2d 213, 670 N.W.2d 400. “A ‘new factor’ is ‘a fact or set of facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6680 - 2005-03-31
City of Sheboygan v. Jay A. Kraemer
-two (72) days after the date set for arraignment[.]” We conclude, however, that neither
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12062 - 2005-03-31
-two (72) days after the date set for arraignment[.]” We conclude, however, that neither
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12062 - 2005-03-31