Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20781 - 20790 of 68887 for law.

[PDF] State v. Peter J. Bartram
of the No. 99-2111-CR 3 magistrate. The case law makes it plain that the decision we review is the one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15864 - 2017-09-21

State v. David G. Rodenkirch
meets constitutional and statutory standards is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7017 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the jurisdictional limits of small claims, and therefore must be dismissed as a matter of law.” However, Spaman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33813 - 2008-08-26

Salwa Rashad v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
,” and apparently neither does case law. The commission found that the work offered to Rashad was suitable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18291 - 2005-05-25

[PDF] Jay W. Smith v. Paul Katz
the interpretation of an insurance contract, which is a question of law that we review independently from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11101 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
raised a new issue “presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Edwards
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194148 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. The interpretation and application of a statute are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. Barritt v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103893 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
decision was based on an incorrect view of the law. We do not agree with this analysis. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31962 - 2008-02-27

[PDF] State v. Johnny J. Waldner
into the defendant's freedom of movement: "Law enforcement officers may only infringe on the individual's interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9033 - 2017-09-19

State v. Andrew C. Polhamus
-in-law after his brother-in-law threatened to hurt his sister. Id. at 809-10, 434 N.W.2d at 381
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14196 - 2005-03-31