Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20781 - 20790 of 63951 for records/1000.
Search results 20781 - 20790 of 63951 for records/1000.
Debra K. Hughes v. Gerald (Rick) Folker
a convenience store in a pole shed on the property. Although the record is unclear how it came about, Hughes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7351 - 2005-03-31
a convenience store in a pole shed on the property. Although the record is unclear how it came about, Hughes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7351 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on its complaint. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, and in light of our court’s recent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171370 - 2017-09-21
on its complaint. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, and in light of our court’s recent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171370 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response, but he has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987090 - 2025-07-22
a response, but he has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987090 - 2025-07-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, a supplemental no merit report.2 Upon review of the record and the no- merit reports, we conclude that Hall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830163 - 2024-07-22
, a supplemental no merit report.2 Upon review of the record and the no- merit reports, we conclude that Hall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830163 - 2024-07-22
State v. Larry A. Tiepelman
review of the record, we conclude that the circuit court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5240 - 2005-03-31
review of the record, we conclude that the circuit court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5240 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). 2 In rejecting the motion, the circuit court noted that the case record was still with this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82399 - 2014-09-15
). 2 In rejecting the motion, the circuit court noted that the case record was still with this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82399 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731624 - 2023-11-22
the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731624 - 2023-11-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654652 - 2023-05-09
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654652 - 2023-05-09
[PDF]
State v. John R. Martin
reference to § 939.623, STATS., (repeat serious sex crimes). This notation is not explained by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11307 - 2017-09-19
reference to § 939.623, STATS., (repeat serious sex crimes). This notation is not explained by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11307 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. John R. Martin
reference to § 939.623, STATS., (repeat serious sex crimes). This notation is not explained by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11308 - 2017-09-19
reference to § 939.623, STATS., (repeat serious sex crimes). This notation is not explained by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11308 - 2017-09-19