Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2081 - 2090 of 16410 for commenting.
Search results 2081 - 2090 of 16410 for commenting.
COURT OF APPEALS
and that the prosecutor made impermissible comments during her closing argument. The circuit court denied Seymour’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90378 - 2012-12-10
and that the prosecutor made impermissible comments during her closing argument. The circuit court denied Seymour’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90378 - 2012-12-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by commenting on Wells’s failure to call Mercado as an alibi witness. The statute provides, in pertinent part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97330 - 2014-09-15
by commenting on Wells’s failure to call Mercado as an alibi witness. The statute provides, in pertinent part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97330 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was ineffective and that the prosecutor made impermissible comments during her closing argument. The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90378 - 2014-09-15
was ineffective and that the prosecutor made impermissible comments during her closing argument. The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90378 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ troubling comments on record, including a statement to a competency evaluator “that he wished his attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163025 - 2017-09-21
’ troubling comments on record, including a statement to a competency evaluator “that he wished his attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163025 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
comment. Allocution is the right to present a defendant’s plea in mitigation of a sentence. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92604 - 2014-09-15
comment. Allocution is the right to present a defendant’s plea in mitigation of a sentence. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92604 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
subsequently moved for a mistrial, contending that the prosecutor’s comment about where Newman’s cell phone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209453 - 2018-03-08
subsequently moved for a mistrial, contending that the prosecutor’s comment about where Newman’s cell phone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209453 - 2018-03-08
State v. Carl H. Wainwright, Jr.
counsel was deficient for not objecting to comments in the State’s closing argument. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15209 - 2005-03-31
counsel was deficient for not objecting to comments in the State’s closing argument. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15209 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is violated if the State comments on the defendant’s silence during a criminal trial. Griffin v. California
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98739 - 2014-09-15
is violated if the State comments on the defendant’s silence during a criminal trial. Griffin v. California
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98739 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The State directs our attention to form jury instruction comments stating that courts should instruct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239253 - 2019-04-18
The State directs our attention to form jury instruction comments stating that courts should instruct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239253 - 2019-04-18
[PDF]
Frontsheet
call. He further admitted making "off-handed comments about the manner in which he believed the case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240910 - 2019-05-21
call. He further admitted making "off-handed comments about the manner in which he believed the case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240910 - 2019-05-21