Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2081 - 2090 of 29817 for des.
Search results 2081 - 2090 of 29817 for des.
[PDF]
WI App 23
review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Munger v. Seehafer, 2016 WI App 89, ¶46
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=775494 - 2024-05-08
review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Munger v. Seehafer, 2016 WI App 89, ¶46
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=775494 - 2024-05-08
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same methodology as the circuit court. M&I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31208 - 2007-12-18
court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same methodology as the circuit court. M&I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31208 - 2007-12-18
State v. Jason R. Brown
of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. See id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15155 - 2005-03-31
of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. See id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15155 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jose R.
legal conclusions are reviewed de novo. Id., ¶16. Here, Jose R. does not contend that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19172 - 2005-08-01
legal conclusions are reviewed de novo. Id., ¶16. Here, Jose R. does not contend that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19172 - 2005-08-01
County of Waukesha v. Laura J. M.
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SNYDER, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19177 - 2005-08-02
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SNYDER, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19177 - 2005-08-02
[PDF]
Frank T. White v. Richard Raemisch
” to cause harm. Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1, 6 (1992) (citation omitted). The de minimus use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15778 - 2017-09-21
” to cause harm. Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1, 6 (1992) (citation omitted). The de minimus use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15778 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Department of Workforce Development
when it applied a de novo standard of review and that DWD’s decision is unreasonable, as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13492 - 2017-09-21
when it applied a de novo standard of review and that DWD’s decision is unreasonable, as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13492 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
determination of whether counsel was ineffective presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115232 - 2017-09-21
determination of whether counsel was ineffective presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115232 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
River Alliance of Wisconsin v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6244 - 2017-09-19
County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6244 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Avery T., Jr.
or defense materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8594 - 2017-09-19
or defense materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8594 - 2017-09-19