Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20801 - 20810 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
Search results 20801 - 20810 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
State v. Obea S. Hayes
2004 WI 80 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 02-1542-CR Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16635 - 2005-03-31
2004 WI 80 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 02-1542-CR Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16635 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Court of Appeals procedures for expedited appeals
statement. See VII(2), below. VII. EXPEDITED APPEALS (1) Eligible Cases. All appeals in the Court
/courts/appeals/docs/expedited.pdf - 2021-10-28
statement. See VII(2), below. VII. EXPEDITED APPEALS (1) Eligible Cases. All appeals in the Court
/courts/appeals/docs/expedited.pdf - 2021-10-28
State v. Thomas F.w.
argues that the appeal is moot because the order appealed from expired on January 4, 1996. A case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9582 - 2005-03-31
argues that the appeal is moot because the order appealed from expired on January 4, 1996. A case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9582 - 2005-03-31
State v. William McCall
judge a drug case fairly. ¶5 Juror Denise Davis identified herself as a school
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2167 - 2005-03-31
judge a drug case fairly. ¶5 Juror Denise Davis identified herself as a school
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2167 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert W. Thurston
incident in the civil case. He asserted that the State was precluded from bringing criminal charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12426 - 2005-03-31
incident in the civil case. He asserted that the State was precluded from bringing criminal charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12426 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2018AP2145-CR 2 our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248682 - 2019-10-16
. No. 2018AP2145-CR 2 our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248682 - 2019-10-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-client” case file to him. Morrison contends the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101932 - 2017-09-21
-client” case file to him. Morrison contends the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101932 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
did not adequately explain its decision; (2) the number of hours the attorneys worked on the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112784 - 2017-09-21
did not adequately explain its decision; (2) the number of hours the attorneys worked on the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112784 - 2017-09-21
Ronald A. Keith, Sr. v. William D. Ridgely
Dampier’s privacy. In each case, Keith filed a petition for mandamus review, seeking an order requiring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13269 - 2005-03-31
Dampier’s privacy. In each case, Keith filed a petition for mandamus review, seeking an order requiring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13269 - 2005-03-31
Ronald A. Keith, Sr. v. William D. Ridgely
Dampier’s privacy. In each case, Keith filed a petition for mandamus review, seeking an order requiring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12888 - 2005-03-31
Dampier’s privacy. In each case, Keith filed a petition for mandamus review, seeking an order requiring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12888 - 2005-03-31