Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20801 - 20810 of 82883 for case search.

State v. Patrick C. Webster
of the felony counts and two of the misdemeanor counts. We reject his arguments and affirm. In Dane County case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13368 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
-22).2 In Eau Claire County case No. 2021CF310, the State charged Young with stalking resulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798545 - 2024-05-07

[PDF] Court of Appeals Statistics January 2024
information about the case filings and dispositions of the Wisconsin Court of Appeals during the month
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=761822 - 2024-02-07

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261647 - 2020-05-19

[PDF] Famous Cases of the Wisconsin Supreme Court - State v. Yoder and Wisconsin v. Yoder
Ct 1526 In this case, the Wisconsin Supreme Court weighed the state’s interest in educating
/courts/supreme/docs/famouscases18.pdf - 2012-10-30

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=843699 - 2024-08-29

State v. Patrick C. Webster
of the felony counts and two of the misdemeanor counts. We reject his arguments and affirm. In Dane County case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13370 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Kristopher G.
. Because § 48.365(2m)(a) requires such a finding under the facts of this case, and because the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10025 - 2017-09-19

State v. Kristopher G.
the facts of this case, and because the record does not demonstrate that such a finding was made, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10025 - 2005-03-31

State v. Patrick C. Webster
of the felony counts and two of the misdemeanor counts. We reject his arguments and affirm. In Dane County case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13367 - 2005-03-31